Multiple-Response Surface Approach: Modeling and Optimization

Abstract:

Many products and processes have multidimensional characteristics and criteria. As these responses involve common parameters and processes, the response data are correlated. The quality and reliability improvement of such products and processes will typically involve multiple-response optimizations to find optimal operating conditions. Many of the current multiple-response optimization approaches assume a single-response uncertainty in the response models, and the uncertainty in the parameter estimates of the models. In this paper, we consider a Bayesian Model Average (BMA) approach to the modeling and optimization of variability of the predictions and the uncertainty of the model parameters. We further propose a Mahalanobis distance (MD) approach to account for the correlations among the response and the variation in the estimation of the response model.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 339)
• Pages: 321-325
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.339.321
• Online since: September 2011
• Authors: Bin Nie, Dan Liao, Jing Ding, Yao Dong He
• Keywords: BMA, Mahalanobis Distance, Optimal Design, Posterior Analysis, Response Surface Method (RSM)

References

[1] E.P Box, K.B Wilson, On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1951,V01.1,Series B,13: 1-45.

[2] R Myers, D Montgomery. Response Surface Methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley: New Jersey, 2002.

[3] A Jennfer. Hoeting, David Madigan, Adrian E. Raftery and Chris T. Volinsky, Baysesian Model Averaging: A tutorial, Statistical Science, 1999, 14(4):382-401.

DOI: 10.1214/ss/1009212814

[4] R Rajagopal, and E Del Castillo, Model-Robust Process Optimization using Bayesian Model Averaging, Technometrics,2005, 47(2): 152-163.

DOI: 10.1198/004017005000000120

[5] P.J Brown, M Vannucci, Multivariate Bayesian Variable selection and prediction, Journal of quality technology, 1998, 33(4).

[6] J.J Peterson, A posterior predictive approach to multiple response surface optimization, Journal of Quality Technology, 2004, 36(2):139-153.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2004.11980261

[7] A.I Khuri, M Conlon, Simultaneous optimization of multiple response represented by polynomial regression functions, Technometrics, 1987, 23(4):23-30.

DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1981.10487681

[8] J.J Pignatiello, Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering，IIE Transaction,1 993,25(3):5-15.

[9] J.A Hoeting, M.D Raftery, A.E Volinsky, Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial, Statistical science, 1999,14(4):382-401.

DOI: 10.1214/ss/1009212814

[10] A.E Raftery, I.S Painter, C.T Volinsky, BMA: An package for bayesian model averaging, R news, 2005, 5(2):2-8.

[11] G Miro-Quesada, E Del Castillo, and J Peterson, A Bayesian approach for multiple response surface optimization in the presence of noise variables, Journal of Applied Statistics, 2004, 31(3):251-270.

DOI: 10.1080/0266476042000184019

[12] N.G Szu Hui, A Bayesian Model-Averaging Approach for Multiple-Response Optimization, Journal of Quality Technology, 2010, 42(1): 52-68.