The Evaluation and Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies Applied to FCC Flue Gas

Pu Peng; Yi Zhuang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.347-353.1479

Paper Titles

Transmission Network Expansion Planning under Improved Genetic Algorithm
p.1458

The Regulation of Grid and Motor Side Converter of DFIG in LVRT
p.1462

Synthesis of Coal-Water Slurry Dispersant Based on Humic Acid
p.1466

Thermal Performance Effect of Glass Curtain-Wall on Office Buildings Energy Consumption from Different Climatic Regions in China
p.1470

The Evaluation and Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies Applied to FCC Flue Gas
p.1479

Roads Accelerate the Invasion Process of Alien Species
p.1483

Dielectric Response of Borassus flabellifier Wood at Different Moisture Content
p.1488

White LED Energy-Efficient Drive Technology Based on Luminescent Relaxation Properties
p.1494

Ultra-Short-Term Ahead Generating Power Forecasting for PV System Based on Markov Chain for Error Series
p.1498

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 347-353The Evaluation and Comparison of Carbon Dioxide...

The Evaluation and Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies Applied to FCC Flue Gas

Abstract:

The CO2 capturing technologies as applied to FCC flue gas in order to reduce GHG (green house gases) were evaluated and compared in this review. Although the CCS (carbon capture and storage) idea has been proposed for more than 30 years, there has been little commercial success of CCS projects. The largest issue is where to store the massive amount of captured pure CO2 every year. Therefore, the review will focus on the efficient use of power or heat to reduce CO2 emission and how to recycle the use of produced CO2 before it is emitted to the atmosphere rather than being captured and stored. The scenarios with oxyfiring, microalgae-cofiring or biogas burning to treat FCC flue gas are introduced and discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

1479-1482

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.347-353.1479

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Pu Peng, Yi Zhuang

Keywords:

Bio-Diesel, Biogas, CCS, CO₂ Capture, Cofiring, FCC, Flue Gas, LCA, Microalgae, Oxyfiring

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] J. Straelen, F. Geuzebroek, N. Goodchild, G. Protopapas: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control , Vol 4 (2010), p.316.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.022

Google Scholar

[2] J.Gale, in: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. Coninck, M. Loos, L. Meyer, Cambridge University Press, New York, (2005), p.75.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Yang, K. Liu , J. Zhang, H. Gong: PETROLEUM PROCESSING AND PETROCHEMICALS (in Chinese), Vol 32(3) (2001), p.49.

Google Scholar

[4] L. F. Mello, R. D.M. Pimenta, G. T. Moure, et al: Energy Procedia, Vol 1 (2009), p.117.

Google Scholar

[5] T. Raddings, in: British Energy Association Workshop, (19th June 2007).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Kuramochi, et al.: Progress in Energy and Combustion Science (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pecs. 2011.05.001.

Google Scholar

[7] information on http://www.sciencecentric.com/news/10062816-carbon-sequestration-boon-or-burden.

Google Scholar

[8] information on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration.

Google Scholar

[9] G. L. Gomes, A. Szklo,R. Schaeffer: Energy Policy, Vol 37 (2009), p.5519.

Google Scholar

[10] D McKeagan: Carbon Capture Journal, Issue 17(2010), p.11.

Google Scholar

[11] K. L. Kadam: Energy, Vol 27 (2002), p.905.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Jime´nez, B. R. Cossı´o, D. Labella: Aquaculture, Vol 217 (2003), p.179.

Google Scholar

[13] P. Collet, A. Helias, L. Lardon, et al: Bioresource Technology, Vol 102(2011), p.207.

Google Scholar