THg and MeHg in Water Bodies of Xiaolangdi Reservoir of Yellow River, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

We conducted two campaigns to study total mercury (THg) and methyl mercury (MeHg) in water bodies of Xiaolangdi reservoir, which were constructed in 2001 and drained for desilification in early June every year. The first campaign was conducted in May 2010 and 7 sampling sites were selected from upstream to the dam. The second campaign was conducted in Nov. 2010 and 3 sampling sites were selected in Nov.2010. Our results showed that the average THg(30.5ng/L) concentration of water bodies in main channel of xiaolangdi reservoir was higher that of in tributary (19.3ng/L) and declined from upstream to downstream water body. Drainage of reservoir could decline mercury in water and water residence time was an important variable affecting mercury accumulation. The MeHg concentration had the same trend compared to THg from upstream to downstream water bodies. Mingzhudao, luoyu and dam water bodies were 0.045ng/L, 0.039ng/L and 0.037ng/L water bodies, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

2413-2418

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] U.S. EPA. Mercury Study Report to Congress, 1997. http://www.epa.gov/mercury/report.htm.

Google Scholar

[2] United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Global Mercury Assessment report.UNEP Chemicals, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. http://www.chem.unep.ch/MERCURY/.

DOI: 10.4095/314922

Google Scholar

[3] Mason RP, Lawson NM, Lawrence AL, Leaner JJ, Lee JG, Sheu GR.Mercury in the Chesapeake Bay. Mar Chem 1999;65:77–96.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4203(99)00012-2

Google Scholar

[4] Xuewu Fu, Xinbin Feng, Qi Wan, Bo Meng , Haiyu Yan, Yanna Guo. Probing Hg evasion from surface waters of two Chinese hyper/meso-eutrophic reservoirs.Science of the Total Environment 2010;408:5887–5896.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.001

Google Scholar

[5] Abernathy A.R., CUmbie, P.M., Mercury accumulation by largemouth bass(Micropterrus salmoides) in recently impounded reservoirs. Bulletin of Environ-mental Contaminnation and Toxicilogy,1997;595-602.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01685984

Google Scholar

[6] Cox J.A., Carnahan,J., Dinuzio,J., McCOy, J., Meister,J., Source of mercury in fish in new impoundments. Bulletin of Environ-mental Contaminnation and Toxicilogy, 1979;23:779-783.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01770041

Google Scholar

[7] Yujun YI, Zhaoyin WANG, Kang ZHANG, Guoan YU, Xuehua DUAN. International Journal of Sediment Research, Volume 23, Issue 4, December 2008, Pages 338-347.

Google Scholar

[8] Jiang H., Feng X., Dai Q., 2004. A preliminary study on the distribution of different mercury species in water of Wujiang river. Envronmental Chenistry,23(5),556-561.

Google Scholar

[9] E. Ciceri, S. Recchia, C. Dossi, L. Yang, R.E. Sturgeon. Validation of an isotope dilution, ICP-MS method based on internal mass bias correction for the determination of trace concentrations of Hg in sediment cores, Talanta, Volume 74, Issue 4, 15 January 2008, Pages 642-647.

DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.06.029

Google Scholar

[10] EPA-821-R-01-033 US EPA Method 1631 Revision B: Mercury in water by oxidation purge and trap and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. United States Environmental Protection Agency, October 200l, l2–l8.

Google Scholar

[11] US EPA Method 1630: Methyl Mercury in Water by Distillation, Aqueous Ethylation, Purge and Trap, and CVAFS. Draft January United States Environmental Protection Agency, October 200l, l2–l8.

Google Scholar

[12] 2001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water,Office of Science and Technology Engineering and Analysis Division (4303), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, DC 20460. 2001; 1–41.

Google Scholar

[13] Xinbein Feng, Hongmei Jiang, Guangle Qiu, Haiyu Yan, Guanghui LI,Zhonggen Li. Mercury mass balance study in Wujiangdu and Dongfeng reservoira,Guizhou, China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157(10):2594-2603.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.024

Google Scholar

[14] Kai Liu,Fang Yang, Xinbing Feng, Xuewu Fu, Ping Li Bo Meng, Zhonggen Li. Concentrations and Species Distributions of Mercury in Water and Sediment Porewater of Puding Reservoir,Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2009,28(3):239-247.

Google Scholar

[15] Tianrong He, YuRong Wu, Xinbing Feng. The impact of eutrophication on distribution and speciation of mercury in Hongfeng Reservoir,Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences. 2010,22(2): 208-214.

Google Scholar

[16] Weiyang Bai, Xinbing Feng, Li Sun, Tianrong He, Xuewu Fu, Hongmei Jang. The concentration and distribution of different mercury species in the water columns and sediment porewater of Aha Lake[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006,26(1):91-98.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02840038

Google Scholar

[17] Haiyu Yan. The review of the analytical methods of mercury species in Environment samples and pilot study in the biogeochemical cycle of mercury Baihua reservoir in Guizhou provence(PhD thesis). Guiyang:Sate Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry. 2005.

Google Scholar

[18] Bloom N.Determination of picogram levels of methylmercury by aqueous phase ethylation followed by cryogenic gas.chromatography with cold vapour atomic fluorescence detection[J].Can.J.Fish.Aquat.Sci.1989(46):1131~1140.

DOI: 10.1139/f89-147

Google Scholar

[19] Vandal G M,Fitzgerald W F,Boutron M F et al.Variations in mercury deposition to Antaractica over the past 34000 years.Nature, 1993, 362:621-623.

DOI: 10.1038/362621a0

Google Scholar

[20] Galloway M.E. Mercury dynamics of a temperate forested wetland[J].Science of the total environment,2004,239-254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.010

Google Scholar

[21] Leermakers M,Galletti S,De Galan S,et a1.Mercury in the southern North Sea and Scheldt Estuary[J].MarChem,2001,75:22-48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4203(01)00039-1

Google Scholar

[22] China. GB3838-2002. Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water. 2002.

Google Scholar