Hybrid Electric and Battery Electric City Buses Benefit Analysis Based on Lifecycle Cost and Emission

Ning Wang; Zai Yan Gong; Jun Ma

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.347-353.952

Paper Titles

Numerical Simulation of the Supersonic Planar Mixing Layer
p.922

Fluctuating of Chemical Reaction Progression Variable
p.927

Resistance Mechanism of Microbial Fouling in Circulating Water to Bactericide
p.931

Ion Exchange Behaviors of Ca(II) and Mg(II) on Lewatit MonoPlus TP 207 and TP 208 Chelating Resins
p.937

Hybrid Electric and Battery Electric City Buses Benefit Analysis Based on Lifecycle Cost and Emission
p.952

Maximum Power Point Tracking of PV Systems Using Fuzzy Controller with Boost DC/DC Converter
p.956

Research of Using Sodium Alginate Fossilization Sphingosine sphingomonas Strain Pellet to Degrade COD of Cultured Seawater in Rizhao
p.963

Removal of Nickle Ion from Mariculture Seawater with Marine Microorganism
p.969

Gas Control Technology for Fully Mechanized Face of Outburst Coal Seam with Hard Roof during Initial Caving
p.974

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 347-353Hybrid Electric and Battery Electric City Buses...

Hybrid Electric and Battery Electric City Buses Benefit Analysis Based on Lifecycle Cost and Emission

Abstract:

This paper took hybrid electric bus and battery electric bus as research subjects, built lifecycle cost model based on purchase cost and using cost, calculated well-to-wheel carbon dioxide emission based on GREET model, analyzed current situation and foreground of new energy buses compared with conventional diesel bus. The results shows hybrid electric bus has advantages on cost and emission in the coming decade. While lifecycle cost of battery electric bus is too high today, and the cost in the future depends on battery technology development.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

952-955

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.347-353.952

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Ning Wang, Zai Yan Gong, Jun Ma

Keywords:

Battery Electric Bus, Carbon Dioxide CO₂, Hybrid Electric Bus, Life Cycle Cost (LCC), New Energy Bus

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] United Nations Statistics Division, Millennium Development Goals indicators: Carbon dioxide emissions (CO2), thousand metric tonnes of CO2, 2008.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Van Mierlo, G. Maggetto. Fuel Cell of Battery: Electric Cars are the Future [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 7(2): 165-173.

DOI: 10.1002/fuce.200600052

Google Scholar

[3] Mathew Werber, Michael Fischer, Peter V. Schwartz. Bateries: Lower cost than gasoline? [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, (37): 2465-2468.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.045

Google Scholar

[4] M.J. Kellaway. Hybrid buses—What their batteries really need to do. Journal of Power Sources, 2007,168:95–98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.063

Google Scholar

[5] Jing Cao, Liguang Li: Effect Analysis of Fuel Saving and Substitution of Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Fuel Cell Vehicles, Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), Aug (2009)

Google Scholar

[6] Reinhart Kühne: Electric buses - An energy efficient urban transportation means. Energy 35 (2010) 4510e4513.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.055

Google Scholar

[7] Hanguo Xu, Guoan, Yang: Green Turing – China Low-carbon Development (In Chinese), Beijing: CEPP, 2010.

Google Scholar