Removal of Nutrients from Saline Waste Sewage with Different Vertical-Flow Constructed Wetland Substrates

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to find the best substrates of constructed wetlands for saline waste sewage treatment, Bio-ceramic, quartz sand, zeolite and medical stone were used as filtering media for saline sewage treatment with proper proportion microbe, isolated from the sewage of the Wuqing sewage treatment plant. In this paper, the purification of the vertical-flow constructed wetlands (VFCWs) with different substrates was studied, and the component of the nitrogen in the influent and effluent was analyzed. The concentrations of chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia (NH4+ -N), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN) and the salinity of the influent during the experimental period were 150mg•L-1, 36 mg•L-1, 8mg•L-1, 36mg•L-1 and 1.6%. Under the condition that the hydraulic loading rate was 0.25m•d-1, the average removal efficiency of COD, TP and TN were obtained about 68.81%, 32.01% and 20.72 %, respectively with Bio-ceramic; 61.92%, 31.75% and 34.33%, respectively with quartz sands; 69.47%, 35.44% and 55.28% , respectively with zeolite; and 64.77%, 32.63% and 34.72%, respectively with medical stone. This result proves that comprehensive purification of the system with zeolite is the best.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

1189-1194

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] NOVOTN EV; MURPHY D; STENFAN HG. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 406(1-2): 2359-2367.

Google Scholar

[2] MONJE-RAMIREZ I; DEVELASQUEZ MTO. Sewage Research, 2004, 38( 9): 2359-2367.

Google Scholar

[3] KACIMOV AR. Journal of Hydrology, 2008, 358(3-4):354-358.

Google Scholar

[4] LENAHAN MJ; BRISTOW KL. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 390(3-4): 131-142.

Google Scholar

[5] LEFEBVRE O; MOLETTA R. Sewage Research, 2006, 40(20): 3671-3682.

Google Scholar

[6] NIELSEN DL; BROCK GN, et al. Effects of increasing salinity on freshsewage ecosystems in Australia [C]// Conference on Prospects for Biodiversity and Rivers in Salinising Landscapes, Albany, Australia, October 20-27, 2002.

Google Scholar

[7] HAMILTON JM; FONSECA JM. Hortscience, 2010, 45(4): 546-552.

Google Scholar

[8] KAYRANLI B; SCHOLZ M; MUSTAFA A, et al. Sewage Air and Soil Pollution, 2010, 210(1-4): 435-451.

Google Scholar

[9] ZHANG LY; ZHANG L; LIU YD, et al. Desalination, 2010, 250(3):915-920.

Google Scholar

[10] MAINE MA; SUNE N; HADAD H, et al. Ecological Engineering, 2006, 26(4): 341-347.

Google Scholar

[11] KASEVA ME; MBULIGWE SE. Sewage Science and Technology, 2010, 61(4): 1043-1052.

Google Scholar

[12] GREGORY SP; SHIELDS RJ; FLETCHER DJ, et al. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(10): 1485-1491.

Google Scholar

[13] KLOMJEK P; NITISORAVUT S. Chemosphere, 2005, 58(5):585-593.

Google Scholar

[14] STOTTMEISTER U; WIESSNER A; KUSCHK P. et al. Technology Advance, 2003, 22(1-2): 93-117.

Google Scholar

[15] SAKADEVEN K; BAVOR HY. Sewage Research, 1998, 32(2): 393—399.

Google Scholar

[16] KARQI F; DINCER AR. Enzyne and Microbial Technology, 1998, 22(6): 427-433.

Google Scholar

[17] ABOU-ELELA SK; KAMEL MM; FAWZY ME. Desalination, 2010, 250(1):1-5.

Google Scholar

[18] CHAZARENCA F; GAGNON V; COMEAU Y, et al. F. Chazarenca, V. Gagnon, Y. Comeau, et al. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35(6 ) 1005–1010.

Google Scholar

[19] YU Y, FENG Y, QIU L, et al. Effect of grain-slag media for the treatment of wastesewage in a biological aerated filter [J]. Bioresource Technology2008, 99(10): 4120-4123.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.001

Google Scholar

[20] CUI L; OUYANG Y; LOU Q, et al. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(8): 1083–1088.

Google Scholar

[21] APHA, Standard Methods for Sewage and Wastesewage Examination, 21st Ed,American Public Health Association, Washington, 2005.

Google Scholar

[22] PAUL EA; CLARK FE. Soil microbiology and biochemistry, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1996, 340.

Google Scholar

[23] HUSSAIN S; AZIZ HA; ISA MH, et al. Bioresource Technology,2007, 98(4): 874–880.

Google Scholar

[24] VYMAZAL J. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 380(1-3): 48-65.

Google Scholar

[25] LIN YF, JING SR, WANG TW, et al. Effects of macrophytes and external carbon sources on nitrate removal from groundsewage in constructed wetlands[J]. Environment Pollution, 2002, 119(3): 420–423.

DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00299-8

Google Scholar

[26] LEFEBVRE O; VASUDEVAN N; TORRIJOS M, et al. Sewage Research, 2005, 39(8): 1471-1480.

Google Scholar

[27] QIU LP; ZHANG SB; WANG GW, et al. Bioresource Technoloy, 2010, 101(19): 7245-7251.

Google Scholar

[28] KARAJIC M; LAPANJE A; FAZINGER J, et al. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 2010, 75 (1): 129–142.

Google Scholar

[29] DELATOLLA R; BERK D; TUFENKJI N. Sewage Research, 2008, 42(12): 3082–3088.

Google Scholar

[30] SIRIVEDHIN T; GREY KA. Ecological Engineering, 2006, 26(2): 167–181.

Google Scholar

[31] HUNT PG; SZOGI AA; HUMENIK EJ, et al. Transactions of the Asae, 2002, 45(3): 639–647.

Google Scholar