Research on 17β-Estradiol Degradation Bacteria Isolated from Activated Sludge and its Degrade Characteristics

Article Preview

Abstract:

17β-estradiol(E2) has estrogenic activity at very low concentrations and are emerging as a major concern for water quality. Great endeavors have been done on the removal of E2 in wastewater. This article was mainly researched the isolated of E2 degradation bacteria from activated sludge and its degradation characteristics of the bacteria were also researched. According to its physiological biochemical results analysis, this strain was identified as K.pnem. pneumoniae .This strain can use E2 as sole carbon and energy source for growth. The optimal temperature, pH for the bacterial growth and degradation of E2 was 30°C,7.0, respectively, meanwhile degradation rate reached to 86% and 87%; degradation rate and bacterial growth increased along with E2 concentration increasing, 81% E2 was degraded when E2 concentration is 30mg/L, degradation rate decreased when E2>50mg/L; metal ions such as Fe2+ and Zn2+ almost have no effect on E2 degradation and bacterial growth; Mn 2+ can promote growth of strain and degradation, while, metal ions such as Hg2+ ,Ag+ ,Cu 2+ have negative effect on bacterial growth and degradation. The degradation process for E2 with initial concentration of 1mg/L indicated that the degradation rate of E2 by strain within 7days was 98%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

2606-2609

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Purdom CE, Hardiman PA,Bye VJ, et al. Chem Ecol, Vol.8(1994),pp.275-285.

Google Scholar

[2] Ze-hua Liu, Yoshinori Kanjo, Satoshi Mizutani. Science of the total environment, Vol.407 (2009),pp.731-748.

Google Scholar

[3] Sarah Combalbert, Guillermina Hernandez-Raquet. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, Vol.86(2010), p . 1671-1692.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2547-x

Google Scholar

[4] Lange R, Hutchinson TH, Croudace CP, Siegmund F, Schweinfurth H, Hampe P, Panter GH, Sumpter JP. Environ Toxicol Chem.Vol.20(2001),pp.1216-1227

DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(2001)020<1216:eotsee>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[5] Jobling S, Casey D, Rodgers-Gray T, Oehlmann J, Schulte-Oehlmann U, Pawlowski S, Baunbeck T, Turner AP, Tyler CR. Aquat Toxicol.Vol.65(2003),pp.205-220.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-445x(03)00134-6

Google Scholar

[6] Nash JP, Kime DE, Van der Ven LTM, Wester PW, Brion F, Maack G, Stahlschmidt-Allner P, Tyler CR. Environ HealthPerspect.Vol.112(2004),pp.1725-1733.

DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7209

Google Scholar

[7] Sarah Combalbert & Guillermina Hernandez-Raquet.Vol.86(2010),pp.1671-1692.

Google Scholar

[8] Atienzar FA, Billinghurst Z, Depledge MH. Environ Poll.Vol.120(2002), pp.735-738.

Google Scholar