QSAR Models to Predict Effect of Concentration on the Adsorption of Phenolic Compounds onto XAD-4 and ZH-01

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is assumed that the experimental adsorption capacity of phenolic compounds onto resin depends upon the molecular properties as well as background concentration of the aquatic system. The utility of this concept has been demonstrated by incorporating concentration as a parameter in quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). DFT-B3LYP method, with the basis set 6-311G **, was employed to calculate quantum mechanical and physicochemical descriptors of phenolic compounds. The logarithm of the adsorption capacity of phenolic compounds on XAD-4 and ZH-01 investigated from the static experiment along with the descriptors mentioned above were used to establish QSAR models. The variables were reduced using stepwise multiple regression method, and the statistical results indicated that the correlation coefficient in the multiple linear regression (MLR) and cross-validation using leave-one-out(LOO) were 0.966, 0.920, 0.905 and 0.797, respectively. To validate the predictive power of resulting models, external validation was performed with Qext2 values of 0.927 and 0.849, respectively. The developed models suggest that the adsorption mechanism of phenolic compounds onto XAD-4 and ZH-01 is different. Concentration, hydrophobic parameter are dominant factors governing the adsorption capacity of phenolic compounds onto XAD-4, while concentration and energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital are dominant factors controlling that of phenolic compounds on ZH-01. The consistency between experimental and predicted values indicates that the developed models can be used for estimating adsorption capacity of phenolic compounds onto XAD-4 and ZH-01.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

340-344

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. Deiber, J.N. Foussard and H. Debellefontaine: Environ. Pollut. Vol. 96 (1997),p.311

Google Scholar

[2] F. Orshansky and N. Narkis: Water Res. Vol. 31 (1997), p.391

Google Scholar

[3] A. Dabrowski, P. Podkoscielny, Z. Hubicki and M.Barczak: Chemosphere Vol. 58 (2005), p.1049

Google Scholar

[4] Q.S. Liu,T. Zheng, P. Wang, J.P. Jiang and N. Li: Chem.Eng. J. Vol. 157 (2010), p.348

Google Scholar

[5] A.M. Li, Q.X. Zhang, G.C. Zhang, J.L. Chen and Z.H. Fei: Chemosphere Vol. 47 (2002), p.981.

Google Scholar

[6] J.P. Wang, S.H. Tang, Z.H. Fei, J. Chen and Y.F. Sun: Chin. J. of Polym. Sci. Vol 28 (2010), p.241

Google Scholar

[7] A.M. Li, Q.X. Zhang, C.Long, J.L. Chen and Z.H. Fei: Sep. Sci.Technol. Vol. 37 (2002),p.3211

Google Scholar

[8] L. Eriksson, J. Jaworska, A.P. Worth, M.T.D. Cronin, R.M. McDowell and P. Gramatica: Eviron. Heath Perspect. Vol. 111 (2003),p.1361

Google Scholar

[9] A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha: J. Mol. Graphics Mod. Vol. 20 (2002),p.269

Google Scholar

[10] J.A. Pople and D.L. Beveridge:Approximate Molecular orbital theory(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).

Google Scholar

[11] Z.H. Fei, M.F. Xia, L. Wu, J.L. Chen, Y.L. Gu, A.M. Li and Q.X. Zhang: Adsorp.Sci.Technol. Vol. 23 (2005), p.255

Google Scholar