Research on GIS-Based Risk Assessment Method of Groundwater Pollution and its Application

Article Preview

Abstract:

The risk assessment model and parameter system of groundwater pollution were established in this paper. The multi-index evaluation method of groundwater pollution sources was proposed, and the GIS-based risk assessment method of groundwater pollution was produced in comprehensive consideration of groundwater vulnerability and groundwater pollution sources. The multi-index method suggested in this paper was used in the risk assessment of groundwater pollution at a plain area of a big city in North China, and the different grades of groundwater pollution risk were computed. The evaluation results show that the groundwater pollution risk is determined by the combined action of ground pollution sources and groundwater vulnerability. The established risk assessment method of groundwater pollution could give a scientific support for the regional groundwater pollution prevention and control planning.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

819-824

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.F. Alemaw, E.M. Shemang and T.R. Chaoka. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Vol. 29 (2004), pp.1125-1128.

Google Scholar

[2] M.G. Brito, C.N. Costa and J.A. Almeida. Engineering Geology, Vol. 85 (2006), pp.14-18.

Google Scholar

[3] D.D. Wu, Z.H. Xie, J. Lin and S. Yang. Geological Bulletin of China, Vol. 24 (2005), pp.1043-1047. (in chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Y.Q. Xue and Y.K. Zhang. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, Vol. 29 (2009), pp.474-481. (in chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] M.N. Almasri. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 88 (2008), pp.577-593.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Dimitriou, I. Karaouzas, K. Sarantakos, I. Zacharias, K. Bogdanos and A. Diapoulis. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 88 (2008), pp.526-538.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.019

Google Scholar

[7] M.G. Brito, C.N. Costa, J.A. Almeida, D. Vendas and P.H. Verdial. Engineering Geology, Vol. 85 (2006), pp.14-18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.09.022

Google Scholar

[8] L. Luo. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), Vol. 8 (2008), pp.72-75. (in chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] J.J. Jiang. Construction Science and Technology, Vol. 21 (2007), pp.32-33. (in chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] D. Thirumalaivasan, M. Karmegam and K. Venugopal. Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 18 (2003), pp.645-656.

DOI: 10.1016/s1364-8152(03)00051-3

Google Scholar

[11] L.N. Shen and G.H. Li. Environmental Science, Vol. 31 (2010), pp.918-923. (in chinese)

Google Scholar

[12] L. Aller, T. Bennett, J.H. Lehr, R.J. Petty and G. Hackett., US-EPA Report. (1987)

Google Scholar

[13] Z.S. Zhong. Earth Science Frontiers, Vol. 12 (2005), pp.3-11. (in chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] M.H. Hamza, A. Added, R. Rodríguez, S. Abdeljaoued and A. Benmammou. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 84 (2007), pp.12-19.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Leone, M.N. Ripa, V. Uricchio, J. Deák and Z. Vargay. Journal of Environmental Management, (2007), pp.1-11.

Google Scholar

[16] I.S. Babiker, M.A.A. Mohamed, T. Hiyama and K. Kato. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 345 (2005), pp.127-140.

Google Scholar

[17] R.A.N. Al-Adamat, I.D.L. Foster and S.M.J. Baban. Applied Geography, Vol. 23 (2003), pp.303-324.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Secunda, M.L. Collin and A.J. Melloul. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 54 (1998), pp.39-57.

Google Scholar