Non-Weighting Assessment Model: a New Tool for Sustainable Urban Landscape Planning

Yi Deng; Ling Cai; Zhao Xian Gong

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.361-363.1182

Paper Titles

Game Theory Analyze for Urban Quasi-Public House Demolition — Based on the Comparative Stakeholders Theory
p.1157

The Culture Memory of the Times — In Urban Redevelopment Should Strengthen the Historical Building Protection
p.1166

Study on Layout Suitability of Rural Settlement at County Level Based on GIS — A Case Study of Pingyi
p.1170

Study of Comparison between Effects on Micro-Climate of Two Sides of Yangtze River with River Wind in Wuhan in Winter
p.1177

Non-Weighting Assessment Model: a New Tool for Sustainable Urban Landscape Planning
p.1182

The Degree Indexes of Sustainable Development of she County, Sun Village, and Tong-Ling City in Anhui Provence
p.1188

Research on Harbin West Old Industrial Area Reconstruction
p.1192

Field Measurements on Micro-Climate and Cooling Effect of River Wind on Blocks near the River in Wuhan
p.1197

Research on a Fuzzy Neural Network Based Medical Institutions Selection in Subway Station Emergency
p.1204

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 361-363Non-Weighting Assessment Model: a New Tool for...

Non-Weighting Assessment Model: a New Tool for Sustainable Urban Landscape Planning

Abstract:

The ecological sustainability assessment of urban landscape planning plays a critical role in sustainable urban development. In view of the shortcomings of the weighting-based ecological assessment systems, this paper establishes a basic assessment model based on non-weighting method. This is achieved by building core index of urban landscape ecological efficiency and introducing a unified measurement of ecological footprint. Afterwards, we discussed the application problems of the basic models, such as boundary conditions and index system, as well as the calculation of corresponding index, and so on. The present study also puts forward the main contents for further study, including the relevance between planning factors and ecological characteristics, planning schemes and their ecological significance, assessment procedures, and so on.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Natural Resources and Sustainable Development

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 361-363)

Pages:

1182-1187

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.361-363.1182

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Yi Deng, Ling Cai, Zhao Xian Gong

Keywords:

Assessment Model, Ecological Footprint (EF), Ecological Sustainability, Non-Weighting Method, Urban Landscape Ecological Efficiency (ULEE), Urban Landscape Planning

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Livio D. DeSimone, Frank Popoff: Eco-Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development (The MIT Press, USA 2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s1066-7938(00)80034-2

Google Scholar

[2] Kine Halvorsen Thoren . The Green Poster: Environmental Impact Assessment Review Vol. 20 (2000), p.359

Google Scholar

[3] Stephan Pauleit, Friedrich Duhme: Landscape Urban Planning Vol. 52 (2000), p.1

Google Scholar

[4] RONG Bing-ling, CHEN Chun-di, DENG Hong-bing: Urban Environment & Urban Ecology Vol. 22 (2009), p.33

Google Scholar

[5] LIU Binyi, JIANG Yunfang: Urban Planning Forum Vol. 138 (2002), p.27

Google Scholar

[6] ZHU Jun, WANG Xiangrong, ChangKeyi: Journal of Chinese Urban Dorestry Vol. 1 (2003), p.36

Google Scholar

[7] PENG Qi-zhen, FANG Guo-yuan, YU Shu-mei, ZHANG Shu-fang. Power System Engineering Vol. 20 (2004), p.4

Google Scholar

[8] Lawson Bill: Building Materials, Energy and the Environment: Towards Ecologically Sustainable Development (China Environmental Science Press, China 2000).

Google Scholar

[9] Song Yehao: Holistic design with nature (China Architecture and Building Press, China 2000).

Google Scholar