Research on Industrial Clusters Networks Degree Distribution Evolving Features Based on Expected Return Factor

Article Preview

Abstract:

The key that firms constructing and maintaining the coordination relations in industrial clusters was the pursuit for profit. The pursuit dominated the evolving of industrial clusters networks structure. And it was featured in the dynamic evolving of its degree distribution. The industrial clusters networks degree distribution model was presented based on expected return factor by use of mean-field theory. Its evolving phase features were also studied by using simulation method. The main findings were as follows: (i) the model had the both properties of BA model and exponential distribution model and it was the extension of them. (ii)The industrial clusters networks degree distribution had scale-free property. The power exponent was influenced by the number of new added edges, proportion of complementary firms, expected return and its weight. Its value was larger than one. (iii)The degree distribution fluctuated regularly as the life cycle of industrial clusters. The main trend was getting more and more gentle. That was to say there would be more focal firms and not only first -come-first-rich and rich-get-richer. (iv)The exponent was larger in higher risk industrial clusters. (v)Complementary industrial clusters would more likely evolve to the central satellite type structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 361-363)

Pages:

1211-1221

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Uzzi: Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 42(1997), p.36

Google Scholar

[2] P.L. Krapivsky, G.J. Rodgers and S. Redner: Physical Review Letters Vol. 86(2001) , p.5401

Google Scholar

[3] W. Souma, Y. Fujiwara and H. Aoyama: Physica A Vol. 324(2003), p.396

Google Scholar

[4] A.L. Barabási and R. Albert: Science Vol. 286 (1999), p.509

Google Scholar

[5] G. Bagler: Physica A Vol. 387(2008), p.2972

Google Scholar

[6] M.E. Porter: Harvard Business Review Vol. 76(1998), p.77

Google Scholar

[7] N. Cai, J.B. Wu and M.Yin: Economic Geography Vol. 26(2006), p.378

Google Scholar

[8] S.W. Li and S.S. Qian: Studies in Science of Science Vol. 24(2006), p.529

Google Scholar

[9] C.Z. Yao and J.M. Yang: Chinese Journal of Management Vol. 5(2008) , p.371

Google Scholar

[10] B. Gay and B. Dousset: Research Policy Vol. 34(2005), p.1457

Google Scholar

[11] J.M. Yang, L.P. Lu, W.D. Xie, G. Chen and D. Zhuang: Physica A Vol. 382(2007), p.704

Google Scholar

[12] H. Inoue, W. Souma and S. Tamada: Physica A Vol. 383(2007), p.152

Google Scholar

[13] M. Kitsak, M. Riccaboni, S. Havlin, F. Pammolli and H.E. Stanley: Physical Review E Vol. 81(2010), p.0361171

Google Scholar

[14] S.N. Dorogovtsev, J.F. Mendes and A.N. Samukhin: Physical Review Letters Vol. 85(2000), p.4633

Google Scholar

[15] S. Qin, G.Z. Dai and L. Wang: Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice Vol. 11(2007), p.159

Google Scholar

[16] Z.A. Liu, Y.C. Lai and N. Ye: Physics Letters A Vol. 303(2002), p.337

Google Scholar

[17] C. Dangalchev: Physica A Vol. 338(2004), p.659

Google Scholar

[18] K. Klemm and V.M. Eguíluz: Physical Review E Vol. 65(2002), p.0361231

Google Scholar

[19] Y. Chen, X. Zong, J. Hao and Y. Xu: Journal of Systems Engineering Vol. 20(2005), p.120

Google Scholar

[20] S. Ree: Physica A Vol. 376(2007), p.692

Google Scholar

[21] Q.Y. Miao, Z.H. Rong, Y. Tang and J.N. Fang: Physica A Vol. 387(2008), p.6225

Google Scholar

[22] J.L. Garcia-Domingo, J. Juher and D. Saldaña: Physica D Vol. 237(2008), p.640

Google Scholar

[23] S.H. Yook, H. Jeong and A.L. Barabási: Physical Review Letters Vol. 86(2001), p.5835

Google Scholar

[24] M.E.J. Newman: Physical Review E Vol. 70(2004), p.0561311

Google Scholar

[25] T. Antal and P.L. Krapivsky: Physical Review E Vol. 71(2005), p.0261031

Google Scholar

[26] O. Chrysafis and C. Cannings: Physica A Vol. 388(2009), p.2965

Google Scholar

[27] J.S. Tan and Z. He: Journal of Management Sciences in China Vol. 12 (2009), p.1

Google Scholar

[28] Y. Li and H.D. Cao: Chinese Journal of Management Vol. 7(2010), p.453

Google Scholar

[29] A.L. Barabási, R. Albert and H. Jeong: Physica A Vol. 272(1999), p.173

Google Scholar

[30] G. Tian and Y.A. Zhang: Science Research Management Vol. 31(2010), p.104

Google Scholar

[31] G. Tichy: Clusters: less dispensable and more risky than ever (Pion Limited, London 1998).

Google Scholar

[32] R.Y. Chi, Y.Y. Guo, S. Duan and Y.Y. Chen: Soft Science Vol. 19 (2005), p.1

Google Scholar

[33] T. Andersson, S. Schwaag-Serger and J. Sorvik: The Clusters Policies White Book(IKED, Hombergs 2004)

Google Scholar

[34] Y.J. Liu and F.Y. Luo: Management World Vol. (2005), p.159

Google Scholar

[35] T. Meng: Economic Management Vol. (2007), p.6

Google Scholar

[36] L.L. Cao: China Industrial Economics Vol. (2008), p.143

Google Scholar