Layers Subdivision and Waterflooding Timing in Low Permeability Offshore Reservoirs with Thin Interbedding

Article Preview

Abstract:

Conducted by the results of numerical simulation and reservoir engineering method, the limit of layers combination and the optimum starting time of water injection are present in this paper. It was shown that in order to improve the development effect of relatively low permeability formation and increase economic efficiency of this kind of field, the reasonable multiple factor after subdividing layers should be less than 5, which means that the permeability difference should be less than 8. Meanwhile, in view of the actual situations and difficulties of offshore development, the injection and production project should be started synchronously.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 361-363)

Pages:

483-486

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.P. Li, Development of the low permeability sandstone oil field, first ed. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 1997, pp.124-126.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.Z. Huang, Flow Mechnism of Low Permeability Formation, first ed. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 1998.

Google Scholar

[3] D.X. Li, Thin interbedded low permeability reservoir development technology, first ed. China University of Petroleum Press, Dongyin, 2007, pp.67-69.

Google Scholar

[4] R.F. Wang, Z.Q. Song, et al, Utilizing advanced water injection to develop low permeability pools, Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field. 10 (2003) 43-45.

Google Scholar

[5] Q.J. Che, J.A. Lei, et al, Effects of advanced waterflooding in extra-permeability oilfield development, Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing. 22 (2003) 20-22.

Google Scholar

[6] D.F. Wang, Z.X. Li, J.Y. Zhao, et al, Advance water-flooding theory for low-permeability reservoirs and its application. Acta Petrolei Sinica. 28 (2007) 78-81.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Bernabe, The effective pressure law for permeability in Chelmsford Granite and Barre Granite. Int . J . Rock Mech. Mni. Sci. & Geometch. Abstr. 23 (1986) 267-275.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(86)90972-1

Google Scholar

[8] Z.L. Yu, W. Xiong, S.S. Gao, et al, Stress sensitivity of tight reservoir and its influence on oilfield development, Acta Petrolei Sinica. 28 (2007) 95-98. Figure Fig. 1 Multiple Factor vs. Recovery Fig. 2 Multiple Factor vs. Yield Percent Fig. 3 Multiple Factor vs. Relative Water Intake Fig. 4 Interbedding Numbers vs. Relative Water Intake Fig. 5 Interbedding Numbers vs. Recovery Fig. 6 Interbedding Numbers vs. Initial Oil Recovery Rate Fig. 7 Injection timing vs. net present value Fig. 8 Permeability, net pay thickness vs. optimum waterflooding timing

DOI: 10.17816/fm7512-145790

Google Scholar