Preparation of Mesoporous Bioglass Coated Zirconia Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering

Article Preview

Abstract:

Porous yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) has been regarded as a potential candidate for bone substitute due to its high mechanical strength. However, porous YSZ is biologically inert to bone tissue. It is therefore necessary to introduce bioactive coatings onto the walls of the porous structures to enhance its bioactivity. In this study, porous YSZ scaffolds were prepared using a replication technique and then coated with mesoporous bioglass due to its excellent bioactivity. The microstructures were examined using scanning electron microscopy and the mechanical strength was evaluated via compression test. The biocompatibility and bioactivity were also evaluated using bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) proliferation test and simulated body fluid test.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

209-215

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.Y. Lin, N. Kikuchi, and S.J. Hollister. A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity. Journal of Biomechanics. 37, 623–636, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.029

Google Scholar

[2] J. Wei, J.F. Jia, F. Wu, S.C. Wei, H.J. Zhou, and H.B. Zhang. Hierarchically microporous/macroporous scaffold of magnesium–calcium phosphate for bone tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. Vol 31, 1260–1269, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.005

Google Scholar

[3] H.W. Kim, S.Y. Lee, C.J. Bae, Y.J. Noh, H.E. Kim, H.M. Kim and J.S. Ko. Porous ZrO2 bone scaffold coated with hydroxyapatite with fluorapatite intermediate layer. Biomaterials. Vol 24, 3277–3284, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00162-5

Google Scholar

[4] X. Miao, Y. Hu, J. Liu and X. Huang. Hydroxyapatite coating on porous zirconia. Materials Science and Engineering. C27, 257-261, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2006.03.009

Google Scholar

[5] S.I.R. Esfahani, F. Tavangarian and R. Emadi. Nanostructured bioactive glass coating on porous hydroxyapatite scaffold for strength enhancement. Materials Letters. Vol 62, 3428–3430, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.02.061

Google Scholar

[6] I.K. Jun, Y.H. Koh, S.H. Lee and H.E. Kim. Novel hydroxyapatite (HA) dual-scaffold with ultra-high porosity, high surface area, and compressive strength. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 18, 1071–1077, (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-0137-y

Google Scholar

[7] C.T. Wu, Y.F. Zhang, Y.F. Zhu, T. Friis and Y. Xiao. Structure–property relationships of silk-modified mesoporous bioglass scaffolds. Biomaterials. 31, 3429–3438, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.061

Google Scholar

[8] P. Barreiro, P. Rey, A. Souto and F. Guitián. Porous stabilized zirconia coatings on zircon using volatility diagrams. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 29, 653–659, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.07.018

Google Scholar

[9] M.M. Pereira, A.E. Clark and L.L. Hench. Calcium phosphate formation on sol-gel-derived bioactive glasses in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 28(6), 693-698, (1994).

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820280606

Google Scholar

[10] Y.F. Zhu, C.T. Wu, Y. Ramaswamy, E. Kockrick, P. Simon, S. Kaskel and H. Zreiqat. Preparation, characterization and in vitro bioactivity of mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 112, 494–503, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.10.029

Google Scholar

[11] T. Kokubo and H. Takadama. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials, 27(15), 2907–2915, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017

Google Scholar

[12] X. Qu, W.J. Cui, F. Yang, C.C. Min, H. Shen, J.Z. Bei and S.G. Wang. The effect of oxygen plasma pretreatment and incubation in modified simulated body fluids on the formation of bone-like apatite on poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (70/30). Biomaterials, 28, 9–18, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.024

Google Scholar

[13] V. Karageorgiou and D. Kaplan. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 26, 5474–5491, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002

Google Scholar

[14] B.D. Boyan, T.W. Hummert, D.D. Dean and Z. Schwartz. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials, 17(2), 137–146, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9

Google Scholar