Calculating Hydrodynamic Loads on Pipelines and Risers: Practical Alternative to Morison’s Equation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hydrodynamic stability analysis is one of the major tasks in the design of subsea pipelines and risers. The analysis is important to ensure stability of pipelines and risers under the action of the hydrodynamic forces produced by waves and currents during construction and operation stages. Morison related these hydrodynamic forces to kinematic wave properties, water particle velocity, and acceleration. However, previous studies show that Morison’s equation does not describe accurately the forces for combined wave and steady current flow. The actual measured forces differ significantly from the forces calculated using Morison’s equation. Though Morison’s equation leads to easy computer application for design purposes, it is a very conservative approach resulting in high cost of construction of offshore structures. In this paper the Wake II Model is incorporated into MathCAD software to practically determine hydrodynamic forces acting on cylindrical offshore structures. The Wake II Model takes into account the vortex shedding effect in the wake of a bluff body resulting in velocity reversal, thus the velocity is modified to include this effect. The modified velocity, time dependent drag and lift coefficients are then used to calculate hydrodynamic forces of lift and drag using MathCAD software. The results showed that the forces predicted using the Wake II Model is significantly less in comparison to the Morison’s equation. The results achieved in this project are consistent with results achieved by Lambrakos in his comparison of the Wake Model predictions with measured forces (actual loads) from the Exxon Pipeline Field Measurement Project (PFMP). The Wake II Model lends itself to easy computer application such as MathCAD so ftware and will also reduce the overall construction cost of cylindrical offshore structures such as pipelines and risers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

431-438

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. F. Wilson: Dynamics of offshore structures. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc: (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] H. Y. Jan, H. H. Chen and J. F. Conlon: Dynamic response of offshore structures. Proceedings of South East Asia Conference; 1982 Feb 9-12; Singapore; (1982).

DOI: 10.2118/10453-ms

Google Scholar

[3] R. Sabag: Wake II Model for hydrodynamic forces on marine pipelines for the wave plus current case. Texas: Texas A & M University: (1999).

Google Scholar

[4] The University of Western Australia. 2008 [cited 2009 Jul 6]; Available from: http: /www. oil. gas. uwa. edu. au/research/research_groups/submarine_pipelines#TopOfPage.

Google Scholar

[5] Gao F, Jeng D. A new design method for wave-induced pipeline stability on a sandy seabed. [homepage on the internet]. The University of Sydney; 2005 [cited 2009 June 30]. Available from: http: /www. civil. usyd. edu. au/publications/r860. pdf.

Google Scholar

[6] Gao F, et al. An experimental study for wave-induced instability of pipelines: the breakout of pipelines. Journal of Applied Ocean Research. 2002; 24(2). pp.83-90.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-1187(02)00012-3

Google Scholar

[7] Gao F, et al. Ocean currents-induced pipeline lateral stability on sandy seabed. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 2006; 133(10). pp.1086-1092.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2007)133:10(1086)

Google Scholar

[8] K. F. Lambrakos: Seabed wave boundary layer measurements and analysis. Journal of Geophysics. 1982; 87(C6). pp.4171-4189.

DOI: 10.1029/jc087ic06p04171

Google Scholar

[9] K. F. Lambrakos et al: Wake Model of hydrodynamic forces on pipelines. Journal of Ocean Engineering. 1987; 14(2). pp.117-136.

DOI: 10.1016/0029-8018(87)90073-4

Google Scholar

[10] I. R. Soedigbo, K. F. Lambrakos and B. L. Edge: Prediction of hydrodynamic forces on submarine pipelines using an improved Wake II Model. Journal of Ocean Engineering. 1998; 26(5). pp.431-462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(98)00006-7

Google Scholar