Comparison of Three Constitutive Models for the Analysis of Laminar Magnetorheological Fluid Flows

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the current paper, three different constitutive models are employed for the analysis of laminar MRF (MagnetoRheological Fluid) flows between two parallel plates. The capability of a recently constructed non-convex constitutive model is compared with those of widely used Bingham model and Herschel-Bulkley model. The comparison among simulated flow velocity distributions and shear stress - shear strain rate characteristics based on different models is presented. It is shown that the non-convex consitutive model outperformance the other two models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 378-379)

Pages:

151-156

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. D. Carlson, D. M. Catanzatite and K. A. St. Clare. Commerical magnetorheological devices[J]. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on ER Fluids, MR Suspensions and Their Applications, pp.20-28, (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] M.R. Jolly, J.W. Bener and J. D. Carlson. Properties and applications of commercial MR fluids[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, pp.5-13, (1999).

Google Scholar

[3] Wang, X. and Gordaninejad, F. Flow Analysis of Field-Controllable, Electro- and Magneto-Rheological Fluids Using Herschel-Bulkley Model [J]. Journal of Intelligent Materials, System and Structures, Vol 10, No. 8, Pp. 601-608, (1999).

DOI: 10.1106/p4fl-l1el-yflj-btre

Google Scholar

[4] Pialet J W, Clark D R. Progress in electrorheology[M]. New York: Plenum Press, (1995).

Google Scholar

[5] D. R. Gamota and F. E. Filisko. Dynamic mechanical studies of electroheological matreials: Moderate frequencies[J]. J. Rheol 35(3), April (1991).

Google Scholar

[6] Philips R W. Engineering applications of fluids with a variable yield stress[D]. Berkeley: University of Califonia, (1969).

Google Scholar

[7] Xiaojie Wang and Faramarz Gordaninejad. Flow Analysis and Modeling of Field-Controllable, Electro-and Magneto-Rheological Fluid Dampers [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, January 2007, Vol. 74, 13.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2166649

Google Scholar

[8] L.X. Wang and H. Kamath. Modeling hysteretic behavior in magnetorheological fluids and dampers using phase-transition theory[J]. Smart Materials and Structures 15 (2006), 1725-1733.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/027

Google Scholar

[9] Wang Linxiang, Jin Fangyin, Liu Rong, Zhang Cheng. Analysis of laminar flow of magnetorheological fluids in circular pipes based on non-convex constituve model[J]. Submitted to Journal of Engineering Mechanics, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Jin Yun et al. Comparison of two apparatuses used in magnetorheological fluids test[J]. Journal of Experimental of Mechanics, 1999. 9: 288-293, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] Spener B F Jr, Dyke S J, Sai M K and Carlson J D. Phenomeological model for magnetorheological dampers[J]. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 1997: 123 230-238.

Google Scholar