Abscisic Acid-Induced Chilling Tolerance in Maize Seedlings Is Mediated by Nitric Oxide and Associated with Antioxidant System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Abscisic acid (ABA) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) treatment significantly increased chilling tolerance in maize seedlings. ABA in combination with nitric oxide (NO) donor SNP further enhanced the ABA-induced chilling tolerance. But the addition of NO scavenger 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (PTIO) nullified the increasing effect of SNP on chilling tolerance. In addition, the combination of ABA and PTIO decreased the ABA-induced chilling tolerance. Measurement of activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content and the level of lipid peroxidation (in terms of malondialdehyde) indicated that chilling stress induced an oxidative stress in maize seedlings. ABA treatment enabled maize seedlings to maintain higher SOD and CAT activities and lower level of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation under chilling stress. ABA in combination with SNP further enhanced the ABA-induced increase in SOD and CAT activities and lowered the chilling stress-induced lipid peroxidation in the ABA-treated seedlings. But the addition of PTIO scavenged the increasing effect of SNP. In addition, the combination of ABA and PTIO had a contrary effect with that of ABA and SNP. These results suggest that the ABA-induced chilling tolerance is mediated by NO, NO is involved in ABA-induced chilling tolerance by increasing activities of antioxidant enzymes and reduced endogenous H2O2 accumulation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 378-379)

Pages:

423-427

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Janowiak, B. Maas and K. Dörffling: J. Plant Physiol vol. 159 (2002), pp.635-643.

Google Scholar

[2] L.L. Song, W. Ding, J. Shen et al.: Plant Sci vol. 175 (2008), pp.826-832.

Google Scholar

[3] S.Y. Lu, W. Su, H.H. Li and Z.F. Guo: Plant Physiol. Biochem vol. 47 (2009) pp.132-138.

Google Scholar

[4] X.J. Li, M.F. Yang, H. Chen et al.: Biochimica et Biophysica Acta vol. 1804 (2010), pp.929-940.

Google Scholar

[5] L. Xiong, K.S. Schumaker, J.K. Zhu: Plant Cell vol. 14 (Suppl) (2002), p. s165–s183.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Jiang, J. Zhang: Plant. Cell. Physiol vol. 42 (2001), pp.1265-1273.

Google Scholar

[7] D.I. Lin, H.S. Lur, C. Chu: Plant Growth Regul vol. 35 (2001), pp.295-300.

Google Scholar

[8] B. Zhou, Z. Guo, J. Xing et al.: J. Exp. Bot vol. 56 (2005), pp.3223-3228.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Lamattina, C. Garcia-Mata, M. Graziano et al.: Ann. Rev. Plant Biol vol. 54 (2003), pp.109-136.

Google Scholar

[10] S.J. Neill, R. Desikan, J.T. Hancock: New Phytol vol. 159 (2003), pp.11-35.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Wendehenne, A. Pugin, D.F. Klessig et al.: Trends Plant Sci vol. 6 (2001), pp.177-183.

Google Scholar

[12] L.L. Song, W. Ding, M.G. Zhao et al.: Plant Sci vol. 171 (2006), pp.449-458.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Zheng, D. Jiang, F. Liu et al.: Environ Exp Bot vol. 67 (2009), pp.222-227.

Google Scholar

[14] I. Murgia, D. Tarantino, C. Vannini et al.: Plant J vol. 38 (2004), pp.940-953.

Google Scholar

[15] I. Murgia, M.C. de Pinto, M. Delledonne et al.: J. Plant Physiol vol. 161 (2004), pp.777-783.

Google Scholar

[16] D. Clark, J. Durner, D.A. Navarre et al.: Mol Plant Microbe Interact vol. 13 (2000), pp.1380-1384.

Google Scholar

[17] T. Brennan and C. Frenkel: Plant. Physiol vol. 59 (1977), pp.411-416.

Google Scholar

[18] D.M. Hodges, J.M. DeLong, C.F. Forney et al: Planta vol. 207 (1999), pp.604-611.

Google Scholar

[19] Knörzer, J. Burner and P. Böger: Physiol. Plant vol. 97 (1996), pp.388-396.

Google Scholar

[20] H. Aebi: Methods. Enzymol, vol. 105 (1984), pp.121-126.

Google Scholar

[21] C.N. Giannopolitis and S.K. Ries: Plant. Physiol vol. 59 (1977), pp.309-314.

Google Scholar

[22] B. Zhou, Z. Guo, Z. Liu: Crop Sci vol. 45 (2005), pp.599-605.

Google Scholar