The Case Study for Diversity in Nuclear Plant Instrument and Control System

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper through describing the comparison between LingAo Phrase II ATWT and Tomari DAS (Diverse Actuation System) in some aspects which including function, structure, and so on. Through the comparison, the author finds the biggest difference between the systems is the manual analog devices are used in ATWT. And the author proves the full digital control system’s performance is used to defense the CCF (Common Cause Failure). Especially the Controller be detailed analyzed by FTA (Failure Tree Analysis) and unavailability, because of the controller’s important. At last the author proposes better solutions for coping with the requirement of the Defense in CCF.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 383-390)

Pages:

4163-4168

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Taeyong Sung. Common Cause Failure in Digital Instrumentation and Control System and Risk Informed Design, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Hyun Gook. A quantitative study on important factors of the PSA of safety critical digital systems, (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] Liudong Xing and Akhilesh Shrestha. Reliability Evaluation of Distributed Computer Systems, (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] Chris J. Garrett. Automated hazard analysis of digital control systems, (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems in Nuclear Power Plants Safety and Reliability Issues.

Google Scholar