A Study on the Effect of Different Median Barrier Shapes in Presence of Single or Parallel Noise Screens

Article Preview

Abstract:

In most mega cities roadside barriers are used to protect receivers from noise pollution during recent years. Median noise barriers, like roadside noise barriers, can be employed to reduce the impact of traffic on roadside communities. In this study, a 2D boundary element method (BEM) is used to predict the insertion loss of different barrier models. It was shown that the performance of a median barrier along with a roadside barrier is affected if another road side barrier will be erected. However, it is possible to apply some new barrier designs to decline the negative effect of the extra roadside barrier. The best shape for inclined median barriers when erected inside parallel barriers was seen to be the tilted designed with 10 degrees slope.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 383-390)

Pages:

5432-5437

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Monazzam MR and Fard SMB (2010). Performance of passive and reactive profiled median barriers in traffic noise reduction, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE –A. In press.

DOI: 10.1631/jzus.a1000065

Google Scholar

[2] Hothersall DC, Crombie DH, Chandler-Wilde SN. The performance of T-shape profile and associated noise barriers. Appl Acoust 1991; 32(4): 269–81.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(91)90075-p

Google Scholar

[3] Fujiwara K, Hothersall DC, Kim Ch. Noise barriers with reactive surfaces. Appl Acoust. 1998; 53(4): 255–72.

Google Scholar

[4] Monazzam, M. R., Nassiri, P., (2009). Contribution of quadratic residue diffusers to efficiency of tilted profile parallel highway noise barriers. Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., Vol. 6, No. 4, pp.271-284.

Google Scholar

[5] Slutsky, S. & Bertoni, H.L. (1998). Analysis and programs for assessment of absorptive and tilted parallel barriers. Transportation Research Record 1176, Washington.

Google Scholar

[6] Hothersall D. C.; Chandler-Wilde S. N; Hajmirzae M. N., (1991). Efficiency of single noise barriers. J. Sound. Vib, 146(2): 303–22.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(91)90765-c

Google Scholar

[7] Cox, T. J. & D'Antonio, P. (2004). Acoustic Absorber and Diffusers: Theory, design and application. (Spon Press, Taylor and rancies Grounp, London and N.Y. USA).

Google Scholar

[8] Ishizuka T, Fujiwara K. Performance of noise barriers with various edge shapes and acoustical conditions. Appl Acoust. 2004; 65: 125–41.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2003.08.006

Google Scholar

[9] Martin SJ, Hothersall DC. Numerical modeling of median road traffic noise barriers. J Sound Vib. 2002; 251(4): 671-681.

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3955

Google Scholar

[10] Watts, G.R. (1996) Acoustic performance of parallel traffic noise barrier. Applied Acoustic, 47(2), 95-119.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(95)00031-4

Google Scholar

[11] BS EN 1793-3: 1998, Road traffic noise reducing devices- Test method for determining the acoustic performance, Part 3, Normalized traffic noise spectrum.

DOI: 10.3403/01264156

Google Scholar