The Research on Ragweed Extracting Solution to Rats Acute Toxicity and Protective Enzymatic Activity of Rats’ Liver

Article Preview

Abstract:

For the purpose of researching the effect degree of insecticidal and anti-microbial activities in ragweed extracting solution on the health of mammal. Firstly, we extracted the activated ingredient which has the function of anti-microbial activities. Then we made acute toxicity test and analyzed protective enzymatic activity of rats’ liver. The result of test showed that extraction rate of using ultrasonic extraction method was 22.16%, which is higher than ordinary temperatures immersion method and heating immersion method. The LD50 of mice with ragweed extracting solution is 4986.396mg/kg. Its toxicity level belongs to low mammalian toxicity. The results of protective enzymatic activity assays on rats’ liver showed that activity of SOD was restrained at first and then was activated. The highest inhibition rate was 15.88% in treatment group and the highest activity of SOD in treatment increased by 1.13times than normal group. The activity of CAT in treatment group was all lower than normal group. The highest inhibition rate was 42.06% through the enzymatic activity change process. The activity of POD in treatment group was invariably in the state of inhibition. The highest inhibition rate was 79.06% in treatment group.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 393-395)

Pages:

1042-1047

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jun He, Zhiqing Ma, Xing Zhang: Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry (Natural Science Edition) Vol. 34(2006), pp.79-85, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Ling Qin, Feng Tang: Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences Vol. 38(2010), pp.15690-15691, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Haiqun Cao, Yongde Yue, Rimao Hua et. al: Journal of Anhui Agricultural University Vol. 27(2000), pp.40-44, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Jianfeng Zhong, Yujie Lu, Fengjie Liu et. al: Science and Technology of Cereals, Oils and Foods Vol. 15(2007), pp.32-34, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Xing Zhang, Zhiqing Ma, Guangze Li: Pesticide Science and Administration VOL. 23(2002), pp.32-36, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Zhihua Hua, Zhonglin Zhu, Zhengjun Shan: Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology Vol. 11(2005), pp.346-348, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] Wenqiao Wang, Jinduo Liu, Wenyuan Zhang et. al: Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences,Vol. 9(2005), pp.74-79, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Swain: Ann Rev Plant Physiol, Vol. 28(1997), p.479~501.

Google Scholar

[9] Xiumei Li: Weed Science (1997), pp.7-10, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Hairong Wu, Sheng Qiang, Hui Duan et. al: Weed Science, (2004), pp.50-52, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] Guocai Zhang, Yang Zhao, Li Ma et. al: Journal of Northeast Forestry University Vol. 38(2010), pp.94-96, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] Chaowei Yuan, Dongliang Yang: Central South Pharmacy Vol. 6(2008), pp.156-159, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] CO. Beauchamp, I. Fridovich: Analytical Biochemistry Vol. 44(1971), pp.276-287.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Cohen, D. Dembiec, J. Marcus: Analytical Biochemistry Vol. 34(1970), pp.30-38.

Google Scholar

[15] MM. Bradford: Analytical Biochemistry Vol. 72(1976), pp.248-254.

Google Scholar