Hydraulic Fracture Height Growth Containment by Artificial Barrier: Experimental Studies

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is necessary to control hydraulic fracture height growth by creating artificial barrier for reservoir with thin payzone or weak overburdens and underburdens. In this paper, the influential factors on resistance role of artificial barrier were firstly identified and the parameters value range was determined. Then, an affixing intermediate container was combined into the core flow test device in order to ensure buoyant diverter well dispersed into carrying fluid in experiment test, and the particle size distribution of buoyant additives was tested by Malvern laser counter. The crack was made about 2/3 length in artificial core for simulating artificial barrier process by core flow test which were accomplished in base of recommendation practice of petroleum industry. Lastly, successive regression method was applied and a statistical relationship of the barrier strength with carrying fluid viscosity, floating additives concentration and core permeability. Then scouring experiments are made under modeling hydraulically fracturing treatment conditions. It was proven that the artificial barrier was steady at current treatment parameters and that could be effectively controlled hydraulic fracture height growth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 396-398)

Pages:

2420-2423

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hu Yongquan, Ren Shuquan: Analysis of factors on hydraulically facture height. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Geology and Devlopment. 1996. No.2

Google Scholar

[2] Nguyen H X and Larsen D B: Fracture height containment by creating an artificial barrier with a new additive. SPE 12061, (1983)

Google Scholar

[3] Palmer, I D and Kutas. G M, Hydraulic fracture height growth in San Juan Basin coalbeds. SPE 21811, (1991)

DOI: 10.2118/21811-ms

Google Scholar

[4] Arp, M E and Hilton, R E. Case history study of fracture height containment in East Texas. SPE 14653, (1986)

DOI: 10.2118/14653-ms

Google Scholar

[5] D M Talbot, K A Hemke et al: Stimulation fracture height control above water or depleted zones SPE 60318

DOI: 10.2118/60318-ms

Google Scholar

[6] D G Garcia and A Prioletta etal: Effective control of vertical fracture growth by placement of an artificial barrier(Bottom Screen Out) in an exploratory well. SPE 69578, (2001)

DOI: 10.2118/69578-ms

Google Scholar

[7] D J Mack etal: Fracture height development and control in the Mississippian sandstones of West Viginia. SPE 84841, (2003)

Google Scholar

[8] Guo Dali, Zhao Jinzhou et al: Experimental study and application of technology of controlling fracture induced in hydraulically fracturing. ACTA, 2003 23(3), 91-94

Google Scholar

[9] Hu Yongquan, Zhao Jinzhou. Research on effect of artificial barriers on hydraulic fracture height. Drilling and Production Technology, 2008,31(1), 68-70

Google Scholar

[10] Zhou Jixiang: Practical regression analysis method[M]. Shanghai. Shanghai Science & Technology Publishing Company, 1984.

Google Scholar

[11] Ma Xiwen: Mathematics theory on the orthogonaldesign [M].Beijing. Peoples Education Publishing Company.(1981)

Google Scholar