Performance of Co-Donor Photovoltaic Devices Based on Graphene-Accceptor System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The poly (2-methoxy-5-(2-ethylhexyl oxy)-1, 4-phenylenevin- ylene) (MEH-PPV) was used as a secondary electron donor material in the poly (3-octylthiophene) (P3OT): graphene bulk-heterojunction photovoltaic cell. The XRD investigation of the active layer showed a well-organized intraplane structure with lamellae oriented normal to the substrate. The mechanism of charge transfer in the multi-donor PV cell was investigated; it shows that efficient energy transfer takes place from MEH-PPV to P3OT. The reason for the increase in the open-circuit voltage which dues to the band structure of BHJ where the energy level change of the highest occupied molecular orbital of the MEH-PPV: P3OT as multi-donor. The hybrid devices showed the energy conversion efficiency of the multi-donor BHJ solar devices with moderate amount of MEH-PPV. The surface roughness investigation indicated the morphology of the hybrid active layer film.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 396-398)

Pages:

2471-2475

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Guldi, D. M. and V. Sgobba: Chem. Communi. Vol. 47 (2011), p.606

Google Scholar

[2] P. V. Kamat: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Vol.2 (2011), pp.242-251.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Hayakawa, O. Yoshikawa, T. Fujieda: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 90 (2007), p.1635171

Google Scholar

[4] K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim: Nature. Vol. 438 (2005), p.197

Google Scholar

[5] K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim: Science Vol.306 (2004) , p.666

Google Scholar

[6] C. J. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci, J.C. Hummelen: Adv. Funct .Mater. Vol. 11(2001), p.15

Google Scholar

[7] F. C. Krebs, T. Tromholt, M. Jørgensen, Nanoscale. 2 (2010) 873-886.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Y. Jung, Z. Guo, S. W. Jee, H. D. Um, K. T. Park, J. H. Lee, Opt. Express. 18 (2010) 286-292.

Google Scholar