Structure and Corrosion Resistance of Iron Coatings Containing Silicon Powders

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fe + Si coatings were prepared by iron deposition from a bath containing a suspension of silicon powders. These coatings were obtained at galvanostatic conditions, at the current density of jdep=−0.020 A cm−2 and at the temperature of 338 K. For determination of the influence of phase composition and surface morphology of these coatings on changes in the corrosion resistance, these coatings were modified in an argon atmosphere by thermal treatment at 873 K for 2h. A scanning electron microscope was used for surface morphology characterization of the coatings. The chemical composition of the coatings was determined by EDS and phase composition investigations were conducted by X-ray diffraction. It was found that the as-deposited coatings consist of a two-phase structure, i.e., iron and silicon. The phase composition for the Fe + Si coatings after thermal treatment is markedly different. The main peaks corresponding to Fe and Si coexist with the new phases: FeSi. Electrochemical corrosion resistance investigations were carried out in 3.5wt% NaCl, using potentiodynamic and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods. On the basis of these investigations it was found that the Fe + Si coatings after thermal treatment are more corrosion resistant in 3.5wt% NaCl solution than the as-deposited coatings. The reasons for this are a reduction in the amount of free iron and silicon, the presence of new phases (in particular silicides), and a decrease of the active surface area of the coatings after thermal treatment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 399-401)

Pages:

1926-1931

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Popczyk M, Budniok A, Lasia A. Electrochemical properties of Ni–P electrode materials modified with nickel oxide and metallic cobalt powders. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2005;30:265–71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.03.026

Google Scholar

[2] Paseka I, Velicka J. Hydrogen evolution and hydrogen sorption on amorphous smooth Me–P(x) (Me = Ni, Co and Fe–Ni) electrodes. Electrochim Acta 1997;42:237–42.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(96)00149-1

Google Scholar

[3] Popczyk M, Serek A, Budniok A. Production and properties of composite layers based on an Ni–P amorphous matrix. Nanotechnology 2003;14:341–6.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/14/2/346

Google Scholar

[4] Karimi-Shervedani R, Lasia A. Studies of the hydrogen evolution reaction on Ni–P electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997;144:511–9.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1837441

Google Scholar

[5] Karimi-Shervedani R, Lasia A. Study of the hydrogen evolution reaction on Ni–Mo–P electrodes in alkaline solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998;145:2219–25.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1838623

Google Scholar

[6] Serek A, Budniok A. Electrodeposition and thermal treatment of nickel layers containing titanium. J. Alloys Compd 2003;352:290–5.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8388(02)01154-4

Google Scholar

[7] Lasia A. Study of electrode activities towards the hydrogen evolution reaction by ac impedance spectroscopy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,1993;18:557–60.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-3199(93)90174-9

Google Scholar

[8] Lasia A. Nature of the two semi-circles observed on the complex plane plots on porous electrodes in the presence of a concentration gradient. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001;500:30–5.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(00)00361-2

Google Scholar

[9] Karimi-Shervedani R, Lasia A. Evaluation of the surface roughness of microporous Ni–Zn–P electrodes by in situ methods. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1999;29(8):979–86.

Google Scholar