The Application Study of Non-Binary LDPC Code

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most practical communication systems need higher bandwidth efficiency; this article increased the bandwidth efficiency through code rate and modulation mode, by combining Non-binary LDPC code with MSK modulation and making practical use of them in communication systems. The simulation result showed that the combination of Non-binary LDPC code and MSK modulation possessed not only a stronger error correcting capability but also a higher bandwidth efficiency, which will probably be more applicable in practical communication systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)

Pages:

2543-2546

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. G. Gallager, Low Density Parity Check Codes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (1963).

Google Scholar

[2] D. J. C. Mackay, Good error-correcting codes based on very sparse matrices, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 45, no. 2, p.399–431, Mar. (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/18.748992

Google Scholar

[3] M. C. Davey and D. Mackay, Low-density parity-check codes over GF(q), IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 2, p.165–167, June (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/4234.681360

Google Scholar

[4] D. Jungnickel and S.A. Vanstone, Graphical codes revisited, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 43, p.136–146, Jan. (1997).

DOI: 10.1109/18.567663

Google Scholar

[5] M. C. Davey and D. Mackay, Monte Carlo simulations of infinite low density parity check codes over GF(q), in Proc. of Int. Workshop on Optimal Codes and related Topics, Bulgaria, June 9-15, (1998).

DOI: 10.1109/itw.1998.706440

Google Scholar

[6] M. C. Davey, Error-Correction using Low-Density Parity-Check Codes. Dissertation, University of Cambridge, (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] X. -Y. Hu and E. Eleftheriou, Binary representation of cycle tannergraph GF(2b) codes, Proc. International Conference on Communications, vol. 27, no. 1, p.528 – 532, June (2004).

Google Scholar