Software Testing Model for Quality

Sachin Dev Kanawat; Apurva Pandey; Abhishek Singh; Anurag Maloo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.4507

Paper Titles

An Efficient Architecture of Decision Support System for Testing Potential Geographical Indication in India
p.4476

Fluid Flow and Random Walk Mobility Model for Wireless Mobile Network Research: A Review
p.4486

A Systematic Approach to Generate and Conduct Destructive Security Test Sets
p.4495

Fingerprint Singular Point Detection Using Orientation Field Reliability
p.4499

Software Testing Model for Quality
p.4507

Prediction of Power Signal in Nuclear Reactors with Neural Network Based Intelligent Predictors in the Presence of 1/fα Type Sensor Noise
p.4512

The Comprehensive Test for Geothermal Tail-Water Disposal
p.4522

The Econometric Analysis on the Agricultural Input and Yield of Shandong Province
p.4528

Measure Research in Organization Intellectual Capital on ANP
p.4533

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 403-408Software Testing Model for Quality

Software Testing Model for Quality

Abstract:

Software testing plays an important role during the software developing period. Any saving on software test will significantly reduce the total cost of software. The key point of this paper is to build a software testing process with the cost control management and to make tradeoffs between the software quality and the software cost. Typical software testing model are analysed and compared. A Quality controlled 3-D testing model is introduced. The model combined with software test process, software quality cost and the testing type. The computational formula is defined to calculate software quality cost. A software quality balance law is introduced to balance control and failure cost. By adjusting software testing method and strategy, organization can reach the objective of the best balance between software quality and the software cost. The result shows an optimistic point that will prove the accurate of the model and the law introduced.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)

Pages:

4507-4511

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.4507

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2011

Authors:

Sachin Dev Kanawat, Apurva Pandey, Abhishek Singh, Anurag Maloo

Keywords:

Quality Cost, Software Testing Model, Software Testing Process, Testing Type

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Robin F. Goldsmith and Dorothy Graham, The Forgotten Phase[R]. WWW. SDMAGAZINE. COM, Articles, 2002, August.

Google Scholar

[2] Robin F. Goldsmith. This or That, VorX?[R]. WWW. SDMAGAZINE. COM, Articles, 2002, August.

Google Scholar

[3] Robin F. Goldsmith. Proactive Testing[R]. WWW. SDMAGAZINE. COM , Articles, 2002, August.

Google Scholar

[4] David Astels, Ron Jeffries. Systematic Software Testing, (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Rex Black. Managing the Testing Process , 2003. 10.

Google Scholar

[6] Capers Jones. Software Assessments, Benchmarks, and Best Practices , (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Bullock, Calculating the Value of Testing, Software Testing and Quality Engineering, Volume 2, Issue 3, 56-62 (May/June, 2000).

Google Scholar

[8] P. Crosby, Quality is Free. McGraw-Hill, New York, (1979).

Google Scholar

[9] J. Campanella, ed., Principles of Quality Costs. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, (1999).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Fewster and D. Graham, Software Test Automation. Harlow, Addison-Wesley, (1999).

Google Scholar

[11] S. Kan, Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, (1995).

Google Scholar