GFRP Bar Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck: Stress in GFRP Bar under Ultimate Design Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

In current ACI 440.1R-06 design guideline, an environmental reduction factor (ERF) is specified to account for long-term durability of GFRP bar used in reinforced concrete structures. Such ERF factor is still lack of confidence to concrete industry prior to deliberate calibrations with in-field real time data. In this paper, a parametric study on the design of GFRP bar RC bridge deck per ACI 440 guideline is presented to investigate the stress level in GFRP bar under ultimate design loads per AASHTO LRFD Specifications. Results show that tensile stress in GFRP under ultimate design loads is always less than 25% of GFRP guaranteed tensile strength f*fu, which is much lower than the design strength per as specified in ACI 440 Guideline (i.e., 0.7 f*fu). It showed that GFRP bar RC bridge deck as designed in accordance with ACI 440 guideline could give sufficient safety margin.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

557-561

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] FHWA-RD-01-156 Report, Corrosion Costs and Preventive Strategies in the United States, Report by CC Technologies Laboratories, Inc. to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, September (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] ACI 440. 1R-06, Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars, American Concrete Institute, Committee 440, Farmington Hills, MI, USA (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] fib, FRP reinforcement in RC structures, Bulletin 40, The International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), Lausanne, Switzerland (2007).

DOI: 10.35789/fib.bull.0040.ch01

Google Scholar

[4] CAN/CSA-S6-02, 2002, Design and Construction of Building Components with Fibre- Reinforced Polymers, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada, (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] Huang, J., Durability Design of GFRP Bar Reinforced Concrete Members: A New Approach, Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA (2010a).

Google Scholar

[6] Huang, J. and Aboutaha, R., Environmental Reduction Factors for GFRP Bars Used as Concrete Reinforcement: New Scientific Approach, J. of Composites for Construction, ASCE, Vol. 14, Issue 5 (2010b), pp.479-486.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000122

Google Scholar

[7] Huang, J., Durability of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bar Used as Concrete Reinforcement: Temperature Effect, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 94-96 (2011a), pp.1573-1576.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.94-96.1573

Google Scholar

[8] Huang, J. Long-Term Performance Prediction of GFRP Bar in Moist Concrete under Sustained Loads, Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 255-260 (2011b), pp.3119-3123.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.255-260.3119

Google Scholar

[9] Huang, J. , Design of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bar Reinforced Concrete Deck Slab: Strength and Serviceability, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 99-100 (2011c), pp.1247-1250.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.99-100.1247

Google Scholar

[10] Huang, J., Sustained Load Effect on GFRP Bar Reinforced Concrete Deck, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 99-100 (2011d), pp.1251-1254.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.99-100.1251

Google Scholar

[11] AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 5th Edition, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, USA (2010).

Google Scholar