Development Research of Failure Theories for Thick Composite Laminates

Article Preview

Abstract:

Current failure theories for predicting failure in composite laminates have been studied and compared in a systematic and detailed manner, to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, together with a ranking of the overall effectiveness of each theory. Careful reading of this analysis and study of figures provided will inform the reader when selecting an appropriate failure theory for use in a given design situation. It will also provide a qualitative assessment of the likely accuracy and reliability of the prediction in a given circumstance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 415-417)

Pages:

347-352

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Reddy J.N. Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells theory and analysis, second edition. CRC Press, 2003.

Google Scholar

[2] Lo KH, Christensen RM, WU EM. A high-order theory of plate deformation. J Appl Mech 1997; 44:663-76.

Google Scholar

[3] Batra RC, Vidoli S. Higher-order piezoelectric plate theory derived from a three-dimensional variation principle. AIAA J 2002; 40:91-104.

DOI: 10.2514/3.15002

Google Scholar

[4] Reddy J.N. A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite plates, journal of applied mechanics, 1990; 51:745-752.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3167719

Google Scholar

[5] Xiao J.R, Gilhooley D.F. Analysis of thick composite laminates using a higher-order shear and normal deformable plate theory (HOSNDPT) and a mesh-less method. Composites: Part B 2008; 39:414-427.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.12.009

Google Scholar

[6] Daniel Gay, Suong V. Hoa, Stephen W. Tsai. Composite materials design and applications. CRC Press, 2003.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Y.X, Yang C.H. Recent developments in finite element analysis for laminated composite plates. Composite structures 2009; 88:147-157.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.014

Google Scholar

[8] David W. Sleight. Progressive failure analysis methodology for laminated composite structures. Langley research center, Hampton, Virginia. NASA/TP-1999-209107.

Google Scholar

[9] Stickler P. Composite materials for commercial transport –issues and future research direction. The Boeing Company, Seattle. 2002.

Google Scholar

[10] Liu D.S, Li X.Y. An overall view of laminate theories based on displacement hypothesis. J Compos Mater 1996; 30:1539-61.

Google Scholar

[11] Ghugal Y.M, Shimpi R.P. A review of refined shear deformation theories of isotropic and anisotropic laminated plates. J Reinf Plast Compos 2001; 20:255-72.

DOI: 10.1177/073168401772678283

Google Scholar

[12] Kant T, Swaminathan K. Estimation of transverse/interlaminar stresses in laminated composites—A selective review and survey of current developments. Compos Struct 2000; 49:65-75.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(99)00126-9

Google Scholar

[13] Qian L.F, Batra R.C, Chen L.M. Elastostatic deformations of a thick plate by using a higher-order shear and normal deformable plate theory and two meshless local Petrv-Galerkin (MLPG) methods. CMES—Compute Model Eng Sci 2003;4:161-76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.02.004

Google Scholar

[14] Desai Y.M, Ramtekkar G.S, Shah A.H. Dynamic analysis of laminated composite plates using a layer-wise mixed finite element model. Compos Struct 2003; 59(2):237-49.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(02)00121-6

Google Scholar

[15] Hinton, M.J. and Soden, P.D. Predicting Failure in composite laminates: The background to exercise, Composites science and technology 1998; 58:1001-1010.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(98)00074-8

Google Scholar

[16] Robbins, D.H., and Reddy, J.N., Adaptive Hierarchical Kinematics in Modeling Progressive Damage and Global Failure in Fiber-Reinforced Composite Laminates, J Composite Materials 2008; 42:1821-1988.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998307086210

Google Scholar