Hybrid Ant Colony Algorithm for Job Shop Schedule with Unrelated Parallel Machines

Article Preview

Abstract:

According to the widely existing job shop schedule with unrelated parallel machines in the actual manufacturing system, a static model with minimize makespan as optimization goal was established, considering precedence, machine-dependent and sequence-dependent setup times. Since basic ant colony algorithm usually has shortcomings such as long searching time, easy trapped into local optimal solutions, this paper puts forward a hybrid ant colony algorithm adopting elite strategy and maximum and minimum ant colony mechanism. Its performance is evaluated by comparing its solutions with genetic algorithm in the literature. The results indicate the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms the competitor.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 430-432)

Pages:

905-908

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] RM Karp: Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller RE, Thatcher JW (eds) Complexity of computer computations. Plenum, New York, p.85–103(1972).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2001-2_9

Google Scholar

[2] M. Pfund, J. W Fowler, JND Gupta : A survey of algorithms for single and multi-objective unrelated parallel machine deterministic scheduling problems. J Chin Inst Ind Eng 21(3) (2004): 230–241.

DOI: 10.1080/10170660409509404

Google Scholar

[3] H.B. Duan, Ant colony algorithm theory [M], Science Press, Beijing, 2005, pp.47-89.

Google Scholar

[4] R.M. Aiex, S. Binato, M.G.C. Resende. Parallel GRASP with path-relinking for job shop scheduling. Parallel Computing (2003), 29: 393–430.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8191(03)00014-0

Google Scholar

[5] C.F. LIAW, Y.K. LIN, C.Y. CHENG, et al. Scheduling unrelated parallel machines to minimize total weighted tardiness. [J]. Computers & Operations Research,2003, 30(12): 1777-1789.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(02)00105-3

Google Scholar