A Bargaining Theory-Based Conflict Resolution Method in Design for Remanufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to solve the potential conflict problem of product design factor optimization in design for remanufacturing, an idea to transform design conflict problem into mathematical model based on game theory was proposed. In the process of design for remanufacturing, a bargaining theory-based conflict resolution method was established by improving the theory of Nash-Zesen bargaining. Energy consumption and cost were analyzed by the given conflict resolution method, and the validity of the method was verified.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 443-444)

Pages:

643-648

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Xu Binshi, Equipment remanufacturing theory and technology equipment remanufacturing engineering. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] Rao J.R. Jagannatha, Badhrinath Krishnakumar, Pakala Rama, Mistree Farrokh, A Study of Optimal Design Under Conflict Using Models of Multi-Player Games, Engineering Optimization, vol. 28, 1997, pp.63-94.

DOI: 10.1080/03052159708941127

Google Scholar

[3] Meng Xiuli, Yi Hong, Ni Zhonghua, Liu Ying . Research on Negotiation Method of Goal Conflict in Collaborative Design Based on Game Theory, China Mechanical Engineering, vol. 15 , Dec. 2004, pp: 2190-2194.

Google Scholar

[4] Xiong Guangleng, Ma Haibo. Research on Conflict Negotiation in Concurrent Design, , Control And Decision, Nov. 2001, pp: 721-724.

Google Scholar

[5] Huang Tao. The tutorial of game theory. Beijing: Capital University Economics&Business Press. May (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] Roger B. Myerson. Game theory analysis of Conflict. Beijing: China Economics Press. Jan. (2001).

Google Scholar

[7] Qi Yunhui. The Research of Green Design Theory and Method based on product energy conservation, Hefei, Hefei university of technology, Sep. (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] Awu Fanglang. The design of production. Beijing: China Machine Press. Apr. (1988).

Google Scholar

[9] Huang Haihong, Liu Zhifeng, Zhang Lei, John W. Sutherland. Materials selection for environmentally conscious design via a proposed life cycle environmental performance index, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 44, Feb. 2009, pp.1073-1082.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-1935-9

Google Scholar

[10] Erik Sundin, Mattias Lindahl, Rethinking Product Design for Remanufacturing to Facilitate Integrated Product Service Offerings, 16th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, (ISEE) , IEEE Press, May. 2008, doi: 10. 1109/ISEE. 2008. 4562901.

DOI: 10.1109/isee.2008.4562901

Google Scholar

[11] Huang Qi, Sun Shouqian, Xu Yurong. Research on Conflict Harmonization in Constraint-Based Collaborated Design Process, China Mechanical Engineering, vol. 17 Jan. 2006, pp: 160-163.

Google Scholar

[12] Lily H. Shu, Woodie C. Flowers. Application of a design-for-remanufacture framework to the selection of product life-cycle fastening and joining methods, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing. vol. 15 , Jun. 1999, pp: 179-190.

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-5845(98)00032-5

Google Scholar

[13] L.H. Shu, E. Hacco, Biomimetic concept generation applied to design for remanufacturing, " Proceedings of DETC, 02 ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Montreal, Canada, Sep, (2002).

DOI: 10.1115/detc2002/dfm-34177

Google Scholar