Constructing Surrogate Models for Springback in U-Bending Process

Deniz Bekar; Erdem Acar; Firat Ozer; Mehmet Ali Güler

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.445.177

Paper Titles

Upper Bound Analysis and Finite Element Simulation of Bi-Metallic Tube Backward Extrusion
p.155

Development of Advanced Broaching Tool for Machining Titanium Alloy
p.161

An Analytical Model for Chemical Etching in One Dimensional Space
p.167

Effect of Melt Quality and Quenching Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of SIMA 2024 and 7075
p.171

Constructing Surrogate Models for Springback in U-Bending Process
p.177

Chip/Tool Interaction during Dry Machining of the TA6V Alloy
p.183

Impact Behaviour of Composite Materials by Using Low and High Speed Impact Tests
p.189

Mechanical Properties of Equal-Channel Angular Extrusion-Processed Al-20Zn Alloy
p.195

A New Approach to CNC Milling Machine Spindle Design
p.201

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 445Constructing Surrogate Models for Springback in...

Constructing Surrogate Models for Springback in U-Bending Process

Abstract:

In this study, surrogate models are constructed to approximate the behavior of simulation models for springback angles, sidewall curl, and sheet thickness reduction in U-bending process. The surrogate-modeling techniques used here are: (i) polynomial response surface (PRS), (ii) Kriging (KR) and (iii) radial basis functions (RBF). While constructing surrogate models, the following procedure is pursued. First, a set of training points is generated using Latin hypercube sampling method, and finite element simulations are performed at these points. Then, surrogate models are constructed utilizing the training data. The accuracies of the surrogate models are evaluated by using the leave-one-out cross validation errors. First-order PRS is found to be most accurate surrogate model for prediction of the springback angles, side wall curl, and sheet thickness reduction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials and Manufacturing Technologies XIV

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 445)

Pages:

177-182

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.445.177

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2012

Authors:

Deniz Bekar, Erdem Acar, Firat Ozer, Mehmet Ali Güler

Keywords:

ANOVA, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Springback, Surrogate Models, U-Bending

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] S.W. Lee, Y.T. Kim: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 187–188 (2007), p.89–93.

Google Scholar

[2] T. de Souza, B. Rolfe: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 203 (2008), p.1–12.

Google Scholar

[3] L. Papeleux, J. -P. Ponthot: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 125–126 (2002), p.785–791.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00393-x

Google Scholar

[4] K.P. Li, W.P. Carden, R.H. Wagoner: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences Vol. 44 (2002), p.103–122.

Google Scholar

[5] M.J. Finn, P.C. Galbraith, L. Wu, J.O. Hallquist, L. Lum, and T. -L. Lin: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 50 (1995), p.395–409.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)01401-l

Google Scholar

[6] R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery: Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, NY (2002).

Google Scholar

[7] M.D. Buhmann: Radial basis functions: theory and implementations. Cambridge University Press, NY (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] T.W. Simpson, T.M. Mauery, J.J. Korte, F. Mistree: AIAA-98-4755.

Google Scholar

[9] J. S Park: J. Stat. Plann. Infer. Vol. 39 (1994), p.95–111.

Google Scholar

[10] M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, and W.J. Conover: Technometrics, 21(2) (1979), pp.239-245.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Chen, X. Qiu, S. Li, in: Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Chapter 7 (2008).

Google Scholar

[12] E. Acar, M.A. Guler, B. Gerçeker, M.E. Cerit, and B. Bayram: Thin-Walled Structures, 49(1), (2011), pp.94-105.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2010.08.010

Google Scholar