Material Selection and Process Design Optimization Framework under Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Article Preview

Abstract:

With an industrial era characterized by new regulations aiming at protecting costumers and the global environment, manufacturers have to be more effective in delivering products that meet customers requirement but also, they have to be apt to dispose of the products properly whenever customers decide to return them. The traditional role of material selection and process design are challenged to take these issues into consideration and provide more effective solutions for the entire (closed-loop) supply chain. We aim at studying the impact of material and process selection decisions in the design of the reverse supply chain. We present an integrated approach that consolidates these design frameworks, and also a total cost approach to be used to set products end of life management decisions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

601-606

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.T. Mentzer, W. DeWitt, J.S. Keebler, S. Min, N.W. Nix, C.D. Smith, and Z.G. Zacharia: Defining supply chain management, Journal of Business Logistics 22 (2001), 1–26.

DOI: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x

Google Scholar

[2] M. Johnson and S. Templar: The relationships between supply chain and firm performance. The development and testing of a unified proxy. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 41(2011), 88-103.

DOI: 10.1108/09600031111118512

Google Scholar

[3] K.J. Petersen, R. Handfield and G. Ragatz: Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management 23 (2005), 371–388.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009

Google Scholar

[4] M. Rungtusanatham and C. Forza: Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions. Part A: Topic motivation, performance implications, and article review process. Journal of Operations Management, 23 (2005), 257–265.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.10.013

Google Scholar

[5] European Commission webpage on electrical and electronic equipment, http: /ec. europa. eu/environment/waste/weee/index_en. htm.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Toffel: The growing strategic importance of end-of life product management". California Management Review, 45(3)(2003), 102–29.

DOI: 10.2307/41166178

Google Scholar

[7] D. Guide, B.V. Jayaraman, D. Jonathan and C. Linton: Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery. Journal of Operations Management 21 (2003), 259–279.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00110-9

Google Scholar

[8] Kodak Sustainability Goals for 2009–2012, 2010 Progress Report, http: /www. kodak. com.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Blackhursta, T. Wub and P. O'Gradyc: PCDM: a decision support modeling methodology for supply chain, product and process design decisions. Journal of Operations Management 23 (2005), 325–343.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.05.009

Google Scholar

[10] X. Geng, Y. Wang and C. Sun: A Distribution Reverse Logistics Model Design Based on Green Supply Chain Management. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management, Honk Kong, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/ieem.2009.5373160

Google Scholar

[11] J-C. Yu, S. Lotli and K. Ishii: Process selection for the design of aluminium components. Advances in Engineering Software l8 (2009), 177-186.

Google Scholar