Evaluation of Draw Bead Geometry on Deep Drawing of Complex Rectangular Shape Part

Article Preview

Abstract:

The control of blank-holder force (BHF), is one of the main parameters in deep drawing. Fracture, wrinkling and inappropriate draw-in of sheet edges on certain locations are the main defects that occur due to insufficient and not well distributed restraining force of sheet flow into die cavity by BHF. It was demonstrated that appropriate utilization of draw beads with appropriate geometry and location in die could reduce or even eliminate these defects. Achieving an optimum geometry and location of draw beads are main issues in tooling stage that would cause high cost due to trial and error. In this paper, 2D FE analyses to reach draw bead restraining Force (DBRF) for several usual draw beads geometries were performed. 3D FE analyses of deep drawing process of a rectangular automotive panel with complex and parametric geometry with the presence of draw beads were simulated by the use of ABAQUS6.9 commercial FEM package to reach an optimization of best location and also best geometry. Response surface method with full factorial case was employed for optimization. Simulation results were validated by experimental data of deep drawing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

96-101

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Samuel, 2002, Influence of drawbead geometry on sheet metal forming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 122, pp.94-103.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)01233-x

Google Scholar

[2] L. Courvoisier, M. Martiny, G. Ferron, 2003, Analytical modeling of drawbeads in sheet metal forming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 133 pp.359-370.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)01124-x

Google Scholar

[3] Z.Q. Sheng, S. Jirathearanat, T. Altan, 2004, Adaptive FEM simulation for prediction of variable blank holder force in conical cup drawing, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 44 pp.487-494.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.11.001

Google Scholar

[4] T. Jansson, A. Andersson, L. Nilsson, 2005, Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part-An evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 159 pp.426-434.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.011

Google Scholar

[5] L. Wei, Y. Yuying, 2008, Multi-objective optimization of sheet metal forming process using Pareto-based genetic algorithm, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 208 pp.499-506.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.014

Google Scholar

[6] G. Sun, G. Li, Z. Gong, X. Cui, X. Yang, Q. Li, 2010, Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming, Journal of Materials and Design, Vol. 31 p.1917-(1929).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.050

Google Scholar

[7] D.W. Jung, 1998, Study of Dynamic explicit analysis in sheet metal forming processes using faster punch velocity and mass scaling scheme, Journal of material engineering and performance, Vol. 7 pp.479-490.

DOI: 10.1361/105994998770347620

Google Scholar