Corrosion Behavior of Enamel Coated Steel Rebar by EIS

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, the corrosion process of enamel-coated deformed rebar completely immersed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution was evaluated over a period of 84 days by EIS testing. Three types of enamel coating were investigated: pure enamel, 50/50 enamel coating, and double enamel. Surface condition of the enamel coatings that were intentionally damaged prior to corrosion tests was visually examined at different immersion times. After 84 days of testing, the damaged coating areas were characterized by SEM, and the corrosion products on and adjacent to the damaged areas were collected and analyzed by XRD. Corrosion initiated at the damaged locations with no undercutting of the coating observed. The 50/50 enamel coating had the least corrosion resistance, due to its interconnected pore structure, and prior damage drastically reduced the corrosion resistance of pure and double enamel coated rebar.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 450-451)

Pages:

445-453

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G.H. Koch, M.P.H. Brongers, N.G. Thompson, Y.P. Virmani and J.H. Payer. Corrosion costs and preventive strategies in the United States. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-156, NACE International, 2002.

Google Scholar

[2] D.G. Manning. Corrosion performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel: North American experience. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 10, No. 5 (1996), p.349.

DOI: 10.1016/0950-0618(95)00028-3

Google Scholar

[3] A.B. Darwin and J.D. Scantlebury. Retarding of corrosion processes on reinforcement bar in concrete with an FBE coating, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol.24 (2002), p.73.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(01)00028-2

Google Scholar

[4] E. Sistonen, A. Cwirzen, and J. Puttonen, Corrosion mechanism of hot-dip galvanized reinforcement bar in cracked concrete. Corrosion Science, Vol.50 (2008), p.3416.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.050

Google Scholar

[5] D. A. Jones, Principles and prevention of corrosion, 2nd Edition, 1996, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Google Scholar

[6] V.F. Hock, S.W. Morefield, D.C. Day, C.A. Weiss, Jr. and P.G. Malone, The use of vitreous enamel coatings to improve bonding and reduce corrosion in concrete reinforcing steel. NACE. Paper No. 08220, Corrosion 2008.

Google Scholar

[7] NRC. International Critical Tables, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., McGraw-Hill, 1927, p.116.

Google Scholar

[8] G.J. Brug, A.L.G. Van Den Eeden, M. Sluyters-Rehbach and J.H. Sluyters, The analysis of electrode impedances complicated by the presence of a constant phase element. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, Vol.176 (1984), p.275.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(84)80324-1

Google Scholar

[9] E. Zitrou, J. Nikolaou, P.E. Tsakiridis, and G.D. Papadimitrious. Atmospheric corrosion of steel reinforcing bars produced by various manufacturing processes, Construction and Building Materials Vol.21 (2007), p.1161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.004

Google Scholar