Quality Classification Model of Material Products Based on Ordinal Logistic Regression

Peng Fei Mu; Dong Ling Zhang; Xiao Mei Xu; Yang Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.460.393

Paper Titles

A Study on the Preparation of Activated Carbon from Hydrolytic Lignin
p.376

Geometrically Non-Linear Analysis of Composite Shell Structure Deformation
p.381

Wangjialing Mine Accident and ChinaCoal Work Safety Risk Early Warning Information
p.385

Improved Design of Thin-Walled Square Tube for Energy Absorption
p.389

Quality Classification Model of Material Products Based on Ordinal Logistic Regression
p.393

Digital V² Controller for Switching Mode Power Supply
p.398

External Characteristics of Self-Excited Induction Generators under Steady State Operation
p.403

Investigated on Fatigue Properties of Aluminum Ally 7050T7451 with Fastener Holes by Laser Shock Processing
p.407

Study on Inside and Outside Circumferential Defects of Pipes and Ultrasonic Guided Wave
p.411

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 460Quality Classification Model of Material Products...

Quality Classification Model of Material Products Based on Ordinal Logistic Regression

Abstract:

It presents a proposed method for the development of quality evaluation and classification for material products, and shows the application of the ordinal logistic regression model and its advantages. It involved several steps: applying the linguistic information processing method, building the ordinal logistic regression model, differentiating and analyzing the quality evaluation to reach the quality classification result

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 460)

Pages:

393-397

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.460.393

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Peng Fei Mu, Dong Ling Zhang, Xiao Mei Xu, Yang Liu

Keywords:

2-Tuple Linguistic C, Linguistic Information, Material Product, Ordinal Regression, Quality Classification, Sensory Quality

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Peter J. Brust, Frank M. Gryna, Quality and Economics: Five Key Issues, Quality Progress[J], 2002, 10, 64~69.

Google Scholar

[2] H. Stone; J.L. Sidel, Sensory Evaluation Practice, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA(1993).

Google Scholar

[3] Allais a, N. Perrot c, C. Curt a, Modeling the operator know-how to control sensory quality in traditional processes, Journal of Food Engineering [J] , 2007, 83, 156–166.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.02.016

Google Scholar

[4] A.C. Marquez, C. Blanchar, A decision support system for evaluating operations investments in high technology business, Decision Support Systems [J], 2006, 141, 472–487.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2004.08.012

Google Scholar

[5] Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multi-purpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems[J], 2001, 122, 277 - 291.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(00)00004-x

Google Scholar

[6] Collett, D. (1991), Modelling Binary Data, London: Chapman and Hall.

Google Scholar

[7] Agresti, A. (1990), Categorical Data Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar

[8] Cox, D.R. and Snell, E.J. (1989), The Analysis of Binary Data, Second Edition, London: Chapman and Hall.

Google Scholar

[9] Hosmer, D. W, Jr. and Lemeshow, S. (1989), Applied Logistic Regression, NewYork: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar

[10] Wooldridge J.M. (Translated by Wang Z Y). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. [M]. Renmin University Press of China, Beijing, (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] F. Herrera;L. Martı´nez. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems[J], 2000, 8 (6) 746–752.

DOI: 10.1109/91.890332

Google Scholar

[12] R.R. Yager. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics[J]1988, 18, 183–190.

DOI: 10.1109/21.87068

Google Scholar