Effects of Eva-Hot Melt Adhesive Polarity and Rheology on 3PE Modes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The quality of modes of 3PE heat shrinkable sleeve is determined by tackiness of hot melt adhesive rather than aging, according to TGA and aging tests. The tackiness of hot melt adhesive influences on pipeline remaining life and the transmission safety of oil or gas. This paper mainly discussed how the tackiness is determined by hot melt adhesive moisture performance which depends on melt rheology and polymer polarity and offer basic information to further modification. Finally, this paper offers a choice data after such follow experiment. About rheology, apparent viscosity was tested by capillary rheometer and tackiness strength was measured by universal material testing machine. Those tests show that Eτ (Fe/Fe) raises and Ep(Fe/PE) increases at first then decreases with apparent viscosity increasing. About polarity, the polarity was tested by dynamic contact angle locator. This measurement indicates that the moisture improves with polarity increasing and tackiness increases at same time. Generally, the hot-melt adhesive apparent viscosity and polarity extend, consider to pipeline materials properties and oil or gas transmission condition, should hold at 450 Pa•s≤ηa (100°C ,20kg)≤520 Pa•s and 82.0°≤γ≤90.6°.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 463-464)

Pages:

58-62

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] BH Yang, CSH Xiong,: China Adhesives 2005-10, 27-30.

Google Scholar

[2] Charles R. Frihart: International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2004, 27: 415-422.

Google Scholar

[3] I. I. Khairullin, V. M. Aleksashin, A. P. Petrova: Polymer Science Series C, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Lhen hongyuan, Liu lingli: China Petroleum Cooperation, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] Liu wensheng: China Elastomerics, 2009, 19(1): 33-34.

Google Scholar

[6] HY Cheng, LL Liu, J Zhao: Corrosion & Protection, 2010, 31(2): 154-157.

Google Scholar

[7] T Ma, HL Zhang: Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2009, 11: 121-122.

Google Scholar

[8] Gibert F X, Marin G,: Journal of Adhesion. 2003, 79, 79: 825-852.

Google Scholar

[9] YJ Park, HS Joo: International journal of adhesion and adhesives, (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] C.K. Radhakrishnan,A. Sujith: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2007, 90: 191-199.

Google Scholar

[11] T Wang, D Liu: Journal of materials science, (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] HE P SH: Hefei: Press of University of Science and Technology of China, (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] Xu A D, Liu L B: Polymeric materials science & Engineering, 1994, 1: 137-139.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Henn, D.G. Bucknall, M. Stamm etal: Chain Macromolecules, 1996, 29: 4305-4313.

Google Scholar

[15] Caigen Yuan, Meng Ouyang, Jeffrey T. Koberstein: Macromolecules, 1999, 32: 2329-2333.

Google Scholar

[16] H.A. Khonakdar S.H. Jafari and A. Yavari etc: Polymer Bulletin, 2005, 54: 75-84.

Google Scholar