Influences of Final Processing Methods on Surface Physical Properties and Fatigue Life for Railway LZ50 Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Different final processing methods can bring about the difference in physical properties of metal materials, such as micro-structures, surface hardness, and residual stress. It can in turn influence the anti-fatigue performance of material. To compare the effects of two commonly used final processing methods on the properties mentioned above, two groups of smooth round bar specimens of LZ50 axle steel were utilized. The final machining process for the first group is finish turning, and that for the second one is surface rolling. Layer-stripping test results reveal that much higher residual compressive stress is engendered in surface and sub-surface of the rolling specimen. The surface micro-hardness of the first group is also higher than that of the second one. Furthermore, the micro-structures of these two kinds of specimens are somewhat different in local regions. Stress controlled fatigue tests were performed. The average fatigue life of surface rolling specimens is more than six times the life of finish turning ones. So the former final processing method is more suitable for improving the performance of present material.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 463-464)

Pages:

85-89

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Yang and Y.X. Zhao: Adv. Mater. Res. Vol. 118-120 (2010), p.75.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Ochi, K. Masaki, T. Matsumura and T. Sekino: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 23 (2001), p.441.

Google Scholar

[3] H.P. Qi, Y.T. Li, J.H. Fu and Z.Q. Liu: Int. J. Mordern Physics B Vol. 22 (2008), p.6112.

Google Scholar

[4] O. Maluf, M.T. Milan and D. Spinelli: J. Mater. Eng. Perform Vol. 13 (2004), p.195.

Google Scholar

[5] S.L. Shi: J. Lanzhou Railway Institute Vol. 11 (1992), p.47 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] F. Klocke, J. Lier: Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture Vol. 38 (1998), p.419.

Google Scholar

[7] Q.B. Feng, J.X. Liu and S.Y. Lv: J. Traffic and Transportation Eng. Vol. 5 (2005), p.1 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] T.L. Ren, B.T. Xie, W.C. Xu, B.S. Shan and Y. Lv: Forging and Stamping Technology Vol. 35 (2010), p.59 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] T. Wang, D.P. Wang, G. Liu, B.M. Gong and N.X. Song: J. Mech. Eng. Vol. 29 (2009), p.177.

Google Scholar

[10] B. Yang and Y.X. Zhao: Adv. Mater. Res. Vol. 118-120 (2010), p.75.

Google Scholar

[11] Y.X. Zhao, J.N. Wang and Q. Gao: China Mechanical Eng. Vol. 12 (2001), p.1343 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Y.X. Zhao, Q. Gao and X.F. Sun: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. Vol. 21 (1998), p.781.

Google Scholar

[13] Y.L. Zhang, Z.H. Zhang and J.Y. Liu: J. Beijing University of Technology Vol. 35 (2009), p.1586 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar