How Does the Stable Industry-University-Institute Alliance Promotes the Performance of the Inter-Organizational Knowledge Creation

Abstract:

The article analyzes how the stability of the Industry-University-Institute Alliance (IUIA) directly and indirectly promotes the performance of the IUIA’s inter-organizational knowledge creation. The stable Industry-University-Institute Alliance directly promotes the inter-organizational knowledge creation performance by reducing knowledge creation period, reducing knowledge creation risk, reducing knowledge creation cost, improving the quality of new knowledge and creating more knowledge creation chances. The stable Industry-University-Institute Alliance indirectly promotes the inter-organizational knowledge creation performance by promoting inter-organizational knowledge sharing.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 468-471)
• Pages: 1856-1861
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.468-471.1856
• Online since: February 2012
• Authors: Ding Hao Liu
• Keywords: Performance of Inter-Organizational Knowledge Creation, Promotion Mechanism, Stable IUIA

References

[1] Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science, vol.42(1)(1997), pp.35-67.

DOI: 10.2307/2393808

[2] Zhang Fangj-hua. Knowledge-based Firm s Social Capital and Performance of Technological Innovation [D]. Zhejiang University, 2005. (In Chinese)

[3] Wei Yin. The Impact of Corporate Social Capital on Innovative Performance: Based on the Perspective of Absorptive Capacity[D]. Zhejiang University, 2006. (In Chinese)

[4] JI Deng-ke. Enterprise network's effect on the enterprise's innovation performance[D]. Zhejiang University, 2006.

[5] Anderson, J.C., Narus, J.A. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships . Journal of Marketing, vol.54(1)(1990): 42-58.

DOI: 10.1177/002224299005400103

[6] Morgan, R M and, and S D Hunt. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing . Journal of Marketing, vol. 58 (3)(1994), pp.20-38

DOI: 10.1177/002224299405800302

[7] Buttle, F.A. I heard it through the grapevine: issues in referral marketing. Proceedings of the 5th international colloquium in relationship marketing. Cranfield School of Management. Cranfield University, England, 1997.

[8] Turnbull, A.P., & Turnbull, H.R. Group Action Planning as a strategy for providing comprehensive family support [A]. In R. L. Koegel, L. K. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.): Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community [C]. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., 1996: 99-114.

[9] Gemünden, H.G., Ritter, T., and Heydebreck, P. Network configuration and innovation success:an empirical analysis in German high-tech industries . International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 13 (5)(1996), pp.449-462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8116(96)00026-2

[10] Wu Aiqi. The Mechanism of Networked Growth of Clustered Firm: An Empirical Analysis on Three Industrial Clusters in Zhejiang[D]. Zhejiang University, 2004. (In Chinese).

[11] YAN Aimin; LIU Zhicheng; LIU Yuan. The introduction and comment of organizational routine research. Journal of Central South University(Social Science Edition). vol. 13 (2)(2007), pp.187-192. (In Chinese)

[12] Michael D. Success Breeds Success: the linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in Indus try-university collaborative ventures . The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 11(2)(2000), pp.255-273.

[13] Andrea Bonaccorsi and Andrea Piccalugadu, A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships, R&D Management, vol. 24 (3)(1994), pp.229-247.

[14] Cronin, J. J. and Baker, T. The Effects of a Distributor's Attribution of Manufacturer Influence on the Distributor's Perceptions of Conflict Performance and Satisfaction . Journal of Marketing Channels, vol. 3 (2)(1993), pp.83-110.

DOI: 10.1300/j049v03n02_04

[15] Shoham A., Rose, G. M., & Kropp, F. Conflict in International Channels of Distribution . Journal of Global Marketing, vol. 11 (2)(1997), pp.5-22.

DOI: 10.1300/j042v11n02_02

[16] Inkpen, Tsang. Social captial, networks, and knowledge transfer .Academy of management review, vol. 30 (1)(2005), pp.146-165.

[17] Powell, Walter W., Kenneth Koput, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology . Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41 (1)(1996), p.116–145.

DOI: 10.2307/2393988

[18] Grant, R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration . Organization Science, vol. 7 (4)(1996), pp.375-387.

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.7.4.375

[19] Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation . Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35 (1)(1990), pp.128-152.

DOI: 10.2307/2393553

[20] Simonin, B. L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliance . Strategic Management Journa1, vol. 20 (7)(1999), pp.595-603.

[21] Helmsing, A. H. J. Externalities, Learning and Governance, Perspectives on Local Economic Development . Development and Change, vol. 32(2)(2001), pp.277-308.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00206

[22] Gulati, R. Social structure and alliance formation pattern: A longitudinal analysis . Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 40 (4)(1995), pp.619-642.

DOI: 10.2307/2393756

[23] Gulati, R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choices . Academy of Management Journal, vol. 38 (1)(1995), pp.85-112.

DOI: 10.5465/256729