Study on Warship Combat System Design Using DMOPSO Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

A new method for selecting warship combat system during the period of warship alternatives conceptual design was discussed in the paper. After computing the overall measure of performance (OMOE) and overall measure of risk (OMOR) of all combat sub-system using analytic hierarchy process and utility function, the design variables representing this equipment alternatives were selected using discrete particle swarm. Niche technique was used for constructing non-dominated sort set and TOPSIS method was adopted to sort the final pareto solution. The results of selecting equipment alternatives in warship combat system show that DMOPSO (discrete multi-objective particle swarm optimization) can search the overall pareto solution effectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 482-484)

Pages:

1963-1968

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Demko, D: Tools for multi-objective and multidisciplinary optimization in naval ship design. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, 2005.

Google Scholar

[2] Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. C: A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. Proceedings of the World Multi-conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, US, 1997.

DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.1997.637339

Google Scholar

[3] Mohan, C. K. and Al-kazemi, B: Discrete particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the Workshop on Particle Swarm Optimization, Indianapolis, 2001.

Google Scholar

[4] Laskari, E. C., Parsopoulos, K. E., and Vrahatis, M. N: Particle swarm optimization for integer programming. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on EvolutionaryComputation (CEC 2002), Honolulu, Hawaii US, 2002.

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2002.1004478

Google Scholar

[5] Wang, K.-P., Huang, L., Zhou, C.-G., and Pang, W: Particle swarm optimization for traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics China, (2003)

DOI: 10.1109/icmlc.2003.1259748

Google Scholar

[6] Blackwell, T. M. and Bentley, P. J: Don't push me! Collision avoiding swarms. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Honolulu, Hawaii USA. (2002)

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2002.1004497

Google Scholar

[7] Riget, J. and Vesterstroem, J. S. A: diversity-guided particle swarm optimizer. ARPSO. Technical Report No. 2002-02. 2002. Dept. of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, EVALife.

Google Scholar

[8] Peram, T., Veeramachaneni, K., and Mohan, C. K: Fitness-distance-ratio based particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium 2003, Indiana, USA, 2003, pp.174-181

DOI: 10.1109/sis.2003.1202264

Google Scholar

[9] Coello, G. T. Pulido, M. S. Lechuga: Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 8, No. 3. (2004), pp.256-279.

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2004.826067

Google Scholar