Firm’s Optimal Inventory Decision under Financial Constraints: A Multi-Period Model Based on Trade Credit

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is better for a firm to make his operational and financial decisions integrated than separately, especially when he faces financial constraints. This paper tries to find out how a firm makes his optimal inventory decision under trade credit, which bridges financial and operation decision as an integrated part of goods exchange, and is an important short-term finance. Following the method developed by Li et al. (2005) and Hu et al. (2010), this paper derives a myopic policy for a firm who orders from his same supplier repeated in an infinite setting. The optimal decision for each period is related to his demand’s density function, cumulative probability distribution function. And there are several directions for further study.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 482-484)

Pages:

942-948

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Alan, and V. Gaur. Information on http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1716925. (2011)

Google Scholar

[2] S. Bougheas, S. Mateut, and P. Mizen: Journal of Banking&Finance. Vol 33(2009), p.300-307.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Caldentey, and X. Chen. Information on http://people.stern.nyu.edu/rcaldent/papers/FinancialServices.pdf. (2009)

Google Scholar

[4] H. Daellenbach: Journal of Operation Research Society. Vol. 37( 1986). pp.525-528.

Google Scholar

[5] D. Fabbri , and L. Klapper. Information on http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1293167. 2008.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Ge, and J. Qiu: Journal of Banking & Finance. Vol 31(2007), pp.513-530.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Gupta, and L. Wang: Manufacturing & Service Operations. Vol. 13(2011) pp.1040-1047

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Hu, M. Sobel, and D. Turcic. Information on http://msom.technion.ac.il/sig_papers/iFORM/Hu_Sobel_Turcic_Dynamic_Debt.pdf. 2010.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Huang , and K. Hsu: International journal of production economics. Vol.112(2008), pp.655-664.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Huyghebaert: Journal of business finance&accounting. Vol:33(2006). pp.305-328.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Kouvelis, and W. Zhao. Information on http://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1048218-1-1.html. (2009)

Google Scholar

[12] L. Li, M. Shubik, and M. Sobel. Information on http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=690864. (2005)

Google Scholar

[13] B. Maddah, M. Jaber, and N. Abboud: Journal of the operational research society. Vol:55. pp.147-159. 2004.

Google Scholar

[14] F. Modigliani, and M. Miller: American Economic Review 48 (1958): 261–297

Google Scholar

[14] M. Petersen, and R. Rajan: The review of financial studies. Vol.10. pp.661-691.(1997)

Google Scholar

[15] N. Wilson, and B. Summers: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. Vol.29. pp.317-351. (2002)

Google Scholar

[16] X. Xu, and J. Birge. Information on http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=652565. (2005)

Google Scholar

[17] S. Yang, and J. Birge. Information on http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1734682. (2009)

Google Scholar