Comparison of Field Emission Performance for Different Diameter Carbon Nanotubes Films

Gang Chen; Hui Zhong Ma; Lan Zhang; Hong Ye Chen; Qiue Xia; Ning Yao; Bing Lin Zhang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.486.47

Paper Titles

Effect of Pd Nanoparticle on the Thermal Degradation Kinetics of Nylon 6/Pd Nanocomposite Prepared by a Dry Process
p.27

Effect of Injection Molding Process on Electrical Conductivity and Mechanical Property of Nanoparticle Filled Polymer Composites
p.34

Room-Temperature ZnO Nanoparticle Ethanol Gas Sensors under UV Illumination
p.39

Investigation of Nano-Structured White Carbon Films
p.44

Comparison of Field Emission Performance for Different Diameter Carbon Nanotubes Films
p.47

Effect of Aspect Ratio of MWNTs on the Nano-Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Composites Prepared by Electron Beam Irradiation
p.51

Visible-Light Driven FeS₂ Nanosized Photocatalysts Prepared by Solvothermal Method
p.55

Fabrication of Nanofibers by Low-Voltage Near-Field Electrospinning
p.60

Synthesis and Characteristic of NiFe/NiFe₂O₄ Core-Shell Magnetic Nanocomposite Particles
p.65

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 486Comparison of Field Emission Performance for...

Comparison of Field Emission Performance for Different Diameter Carbon Nanotubes Films

Abstract:

Three kinds of different diameter carbon nanotubes (CNTS) films deposited on aluminum sheets by electrophoretic deposition method. Scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the surface morphology of the films. The field emission properties of the films were tested by using a diode structure. The turn-on field for 8nm diameter CNTs film was 0.8V/μm and the current density of 5200μA/cm2 was obtained at 2.3V/μm. While corresponding data for 15nm and 30nm CNTs films were 1.6V/μm, 1.4V/μm, and 2200μA/cm2, 850μA/cm2 at 3.0V/μm respectively. The deposited film with 8nm diameter CNTs appeared excellent emission properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 486)

Pages:

47-50

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.486.47

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2012

Authors:

Gang Chen, Hui Zhong Ma, Lan Zhang, Hong Ye Chen, Qiue Xia, Ning Yao, Bing Lin Zhang

Keywords:

Carbon Nanotube (CN), Electrophoretic, Field Electron Emission, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Yahachi Saito, Sashiro Uemura: Carbon 38(2000), p.169.

Google Scholar

[2] Rinzler A G, Hafner J H, Lou L, et. al,: Science 269(1995), p.1550.

Google Scholar

[3] De Heer WA, ChatelainA, Ugarte D: Science 270(1995), p.1179.

Google Scholar

[4] N. S. Lee, D. S. Chung, I. T. Han, J. H. Kang, Y. S. Choi, H. Y. Kim, S. H. Park, Y. W. Jin, W. K. Yi, M. J. Yun, J. E. Jung, C. J. Lee, J. H You, S. H. Jo, C. G. Lee, J. M. Kim: Diamond and Related Materials 10(2001), p.265.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-9635(00)00478-7

Google Scholar

[5] W. B. Choi, Y. W. Jin, H. Y. Kim, S. J. Lee, M. J. Yun, J. H. Kang, Y. S. Choi,N. S. Park, N. S. Lee, and J. M. Kim: Applied Physics Letters 78(2001), p.1547.

Google Scholar

[6] Chunsheng Du, D. Heldebrant, Ning Pan: Journal of Materials Science Letters 21(2002). P. 565.

Google Scholar

[7] Huizhong Ma, Lan Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Liwei Zhang, Ning Yao, Binglin Zhang: Applied Surface Science 251(2005), p.258.

DOI: 10.1109/ivesc.2004.1414213

Google Scholar