An Improved Immune Algorithm for Manufacturing Scheduling

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper addresses an n-job, m-machine permutation flow shop scheduling problem to minimize makespan criterion. We present a modification of the best-known immune algorithm of Engin and Döyen (2004) [A new approach to solve hybrid flowshop scheduling problems by artificial immune system. Future Generations Computer Systems 2004;20:1083-1095] for this problem. To evaluate the solution quality and efficiency of the proposed method, the experiments are carried out in two phases on a set of benchmark problems and analyzed. We show, through computational experimentation, that this modification considerably improves its performance without affecting its time complexity. The proposed method also has been compared with the currently best simulated annealing from the literature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

1109-1113

Citation:

Online since:

March 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Gao, L. Sun and M. Gen: Computers and Operational Research Vol. 35 (2008), p.2892.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Mori, M. Tsukiyama and T. Fukuda: Transactions of IEEE Japan Vol. 113C (1993), p.872.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Agarwal, M.K. Tiwari and S.K. Mukherjee: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 43 (2006), p.584.

Google Scholar

[4] L.N. De Castro and J. Timmis: Artificial immune systems: A new computational intelligence approach ( London, Springer-Verlag 2002).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Dasgupta and S. Forrest: Artificial immune systems in industrial applications, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing Materials Honolulu (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/ipmm.1999.792486

Google Scholar

[6] L.N. De Castro and F.J. Von Zuben: The clonal selection algorithm with engineering applications, in: Proceedings of the Workshop Las Vegas (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Dasgupta (Ed. ), Artificial Immune Systems and their applications (Springer-Verlag 1999).

Google Scholar

[8] E. Hart and J. Timmis: Applied Soft Computing Vol. 8 (2008), p.191.

Google Scholar

[9] A.P.G. Brown and Z.A. Lomnicki: Operational research Quarterly Vol. 17 (1966), p.173.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Nawaz, E.E. Enscore and I. Ham: Omega Vol. 11 (1983), p.91.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Laha and S. C. Sarin: Omega Vol. 37 (2009), p.734.

Google Scholar

[12] C.R. Reeves: Computers and Operations Research Vol. 22 (1996), p.5.

Google Scholar

[13] D. Laha and U.K. Chakraborty: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Vol. 20 (2007), p.851.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Zandieh, S.M.T.F. Ghomi and S.M.M. Husseini: Applied Mathematics and Computation Vol. 180 (2006), p.111.

Google Scholar

[15] M.E. Kurz and R.G. Askin: European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 159 (2004), p.66.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Bagheri, B. Zandieh, M. Iraj, M. Yazdani and C. Future: Generation Computer Systems Vol. 26 (2010), p.533.

Google Scholar

[17] W. Xia and Z. Wu: Computers and Industrial Engineering Vol. 48 (2005), p.409.

Google Scholar

[18] I. Kacem, S. Hammandi and N. Borne: IEEE Transaction on systems, man and cybernetics, Part C Vol. 32 (2002), p.1.

Google Scholar

[19] H. Zhang and M. Gen: International Journal of Complexity Vol. 11 (2005), p.223.

Google Scholar

[20] O. Engin and A. Döyen: Future Generations Computer Systems Vol. 20 (2004), p.1083.

Google Scholar

[21] I.H. Osman and C.N. Potts: Omega Vol. 17 (1989), p.551.

Google Scholar

[22] T. Gonzalez and S. Sahni: Operations Research Vol. 26 (1978), p.36.

Google Scholar

[23] E. Taillard: European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 47 (1990), p.64.

Google Scholar