Estimating and Modeling Uncertainties Affecting Production Throughput Using ARIMA-Multiple Linear Regression

Article Preview

Abstract:

Throughput of each production stage cannot meet the demand in the real production system because of the disruptions and interruptions of the production line for example break time and scrap. On the other hand, demand changes over time due to volume variation and product redesign as the customers’ needs are changing. This situation leads to planning and controlling under uncertain condition. This paper proposes a hybrid model of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) for estimating and modeling the random variables of production line in order to forecast the throughput in presence of production variations and demand fluctuation. The random variables under consideration of this study are demand, break-time, scrap, and lead-time. The random variables are formulated in the MLR model, where the mean absolute percentage of error (MAPE) was 2.53%. Further, nine ARIMA models with different parameters in MLR model are fitted to the data and compared by their MAPE. The best model with the lowest MAPE was when the ARIMA parameters set for p=1, d=0, and q=3. Finally the proposed model using ARIMA-MLR is formulated by MAPE of 1.55%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

1263-1267

Citation:

Online since:

March 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Li, Q. Chang, G. Xiao, S. Ambani. Throughput Bottleneck Prediction of Manufacturing Systems Using Time Series Analysis, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 133 (2011), 021015.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4003786

Google Scholar

[2] W.W.S. Wei. Time series analysis, Addison-Wesley Redwood City, California, (1990).

Google Scholar

[3] G. Kirchgässner, J. Wolters. Introduction to modern time series analysis, Springer Verlag, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] A.I. Sivakumar, C.S. Chong. A simulation based analysis of cycle time distribution, and throughput in semiconductor backend manufacturing, Computers in Industry 45 (2001), pp.59-78.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-3615(01)00081-1

Google Scholar

[5] C.F. Chien, C.W. Hsiao, C. Meng, K.T. Hong, S.T. Wang. Cycle time prediction and control based on production line status and manufacturing data mining, IEEE, (2005), pp.327-330.

DOI: 10.1109/issm.2005.1513369

Google Scholar

[6] J. Li, D.E. Blumenfeld, N. Huang, J.M. Alden. Throughput analysis of production systems: recent advances and future topics, International Journal of Production Research 47 (2009), pp.3823-3851.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540701829752

Google Scholar

[7] D.E. Blumenfeld, J. Li. An analytical formula for throughput of a production line with identical stations and random failures, Mathematical Problems in Engineering 3 (2005), pp.293-308.

DOI: 10.1155/mpe.2005.293

Google Scholar

[8] K.R. Baker, S.G. Powell. A predictive model for the throughput of simple assembly systems, European journal of operational research 81 (1995), pp.336-345.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)e0283-4

Google Scholar

[9] D.C. Montgomery, E.A. Peck, G.G. Vining, J. Vining. Introduction to linear regression analysis, chapter, 3 and 13, Wiley New York, (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] C.F. Chien, C.Y. Hsu, C.W. Hsiao. Manufacturing intelligence to forecast and reduce semiconductor cycle time, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (2011), pp.1-14.

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-011-0572-y

Google Scholar