Degradation of Butylparaben by Ozonation and UV/TiO2 Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Butylparaben is widely used as a bactericide and as an antimicrobial agent in the formation of personal care products (PCPs). Owing to a certain estrogenic activity, a possible relationship with breast cancer has been proved by many researchers. The removal efficiency of butylparaben in aqueous solutions was studied using advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). These results indicate that the reaction rates for the ozonation of butylparaben in water are higher under the concentration of ozone 5 mg/L in alkaline condition. The original concentration of butylparaben almost degraded within 50, 30, and 20 min at ozone concentrations of 1, 3, and 5 mg/L, respectively at pH 11 runs. The ozonation imposed butylparaben with a time dependence that appeared to follow pseudo first-order kinetics. The original butylparaben was degraded 50 %, 40%, 35%, and 32% within 24 hr at pH 3, 6, 9, and 11 respectively by UV/TiO2 process in the O2-sparged concentration of 30 mg/L. The rate constants are 0.045, 0.043, 0.025, and 0.020 hr-1 at the butylparaben concentrations of 10.30, 20.60, 30.90, and 41.20 μM, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

159-163

Citation:

Online since:

March 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Cabana, J. H. Jiwan, R. Rozenberg, V. Dlisashvili, M. Penninckx, S. N. Agathos, and J. Peter Jones: Chemosphere Vol. 67 (2007), p.770.

Google Scholar

[2] P. D. Darbre: Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. Vol. 20 (2006), p.121.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Lakeram, D. J. Lockley, D. J. Sanders, R. Pendlington and B. Forbes: J. Biomol. Screen Vol. 12 (2007), p.84.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Jeidler, A. Sapkota and R. U. Halden: Environ. Dci. Technol. Vol. 40 (2006), p.3634.

Google Scholar

[5] A. D. Dayan: Int. J. Clin. Prac. Vol. 60 (2006), p.1009.

Google Scholar

[6] A. L. Cashman and E. M. Warshaw: Dermatitis Vol. 16 (2) (2005), p.57.

Google Scholar

[7] P. D. Darbre, A. Aljarrah, W. R. Miller, N. G. Coldham, M. J. Sauer and G. S. Pope: J. Appl. Toxicol. Vol. 24 (2004), p.5.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Yargeau and C. Leclair: Ozone Sci. Eng. Vol. 30 (2008), p.175.

Google Scholar

[9] R. F. Dantas, S. Contreras, S. Sans and S. Esplugas: J. Hazard Mater. Vol. 150 (2008), p.790.

Google Scholar

[10] APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., APHA, AWWA and WPCF. Washington, DC, (1992).

Google Scholar

[11] M.M. Ayad, H.E. Abdellatef, M.M. EI-Henawee and H.M. EI-Sayed, Spectrochim. Acta A Vol. 66 (2007), p.106.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Fujishima, T.N. Rao and D.A. Tryk, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Vol. 1 (2000), p.1.

Google Scholar

[13] D.F. Ollis, E. Pelizzetti and N. Serpone, Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 25 (1991), p.1522.

Google Scholar

[14] S.L. Murov, I. Carmichael G.L. Huy, Handbook of photochemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York, (1993).

Google Scholar

[15] N. Daneshvar, M. Rabbani, N. Modirshahla and M.A. Behnajady, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Vol. 168 (2004), p.39.

Google Scholar