Anisotropy and Forming Characteristics of Magnesium Alloy ZE10

M. Waseem Soomro; R. Khan; M. Akhtar

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.295

Paper Titles

Challenges and the Way Forward for Building Materials Management in Building Adaptation Projects
p.274

Centrifugal Atomization of Zinc Metal Powder for Friction Materials Application
p.281

Compositions and Particle Sizes of (RE)Ba₂Cu₃O_7-XSuperconductor Powders Synthesized by the Solution Combustion Technique
p.286

Bulk Crystallization of Ceramic Whiskers from Borate-Based Glass
p.291

Anisotropy and Forming Characteristics of Magnesium Alloy ZE10
p.295

Investigations of Tungsten Based Intermetallic Alloys by Self Propagating High Temperature Synthesis from Metal Oxide Precursors
p.300

Effect of Al Mole Ratio on Iron Aluminide Reinforced with TiB₂-Al₂O₃ Composite by Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis
p.305

Low Temperature Synthesis of Pb(Zr_0.52Ti_0.48)O₃ Ceramic Powders by Chelating Agent Assisted Sol-Gel Process
p.310

Effect of Grain Size on the Shape Recovery in a Melt-Spun Fe-24%Mn-4%Si-5%Cr-5%Co SMA Ribbon
p.315

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 488-489Anisotropy and Forming Characteristics of...

Anisotropy and Forming Characteristics of Magnesium Alloy ZE10

Abstract:

The current work investigates anisotropy and forming characteristics of ZE10 Mg alloy. Anisotropic effects are measured by analysing tensile tests data for the specimens from 0o, 45o and 90o rolling directions of thin sheet of 0.8 mm thickness. The effects of temperature and strain rates are also included in anisotropic analyses. The mechanical properties of ZE10 alloy are affected by the physical conditions like temperature and strain rates. The effect is significant on yield strength, UTS and fracture strain while small variation is observed in case of Young’s modulus. Deep drawing experiments have been done to investigate the effects of temperature on forming characteristics and limit drawing ratio (LDR) of an alloy. Forming investigation shows that it is difficult to produce a good or unfractured part at 100 oC, but it can be produce at 150 oC or higher with different combinations of blank holder force and drawing ratio. Also, LDR and blank holder force also effects required punch force.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

295-299

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.295

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2012

Authors:

M. Waseem Soomro, R. Khan, M. Akhtar

Keywords:

Anisotropy, Forming, Limit Drawing Ratio (LDR), Magnesium

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] H. Furuya, N. Kogiso, S. Matunaga and K. Senda: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 350 (2000), p.341.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Cavaliere and P. Marco: Mater. Sci. Vol. 41 (2006), p.3459.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Kaneko, M. Sugamata, M. Numa, Y. Nishikawa and H. Takada: J. Japan Inst. of Metals Vol. 64 (2000), p.141.

Google Scholar

[4] F. K. Abu-Farha: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kentucky, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Meyers and Chawla: Mechanical Metallurgy Principles and Applications, Prentice Hall, (1984).

Google Scholar

[6] F. Abu-Farha, N. Rawashdeh and M. Khraisheh: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 551-552, (2007), p.219.

Google Scholar

[7] S. R. Agnew and O. Duygulu: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 419-422 (2003), p.177.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Aghion, B. Bronfin and D. Eliezer: Mater. Proc. Tech. Vol. 117 (2001), p.381.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Friedrich and S. Schumann: Mater. Proc. Tech. Vol. 117 (2001), p.276.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Abu-Farha and M. Khraisheh: Proceedings of the 8th ESAFORM Conference on Mater ming, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, p.627, April 27-29 (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] C. Chang, C. Lee and J. Huang: Scripta Materialia Vol. 51 (2004), p.509.

Google Scholar

[12] M. K. Khraisheh: Engg. Mater. and Tech. Vol. 122 (2000), p.93.

Google Scholar

[13] N. V. Thuramalla and M. K. Khraisheh: Proceedings of the Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Elsevier, Vol. 1 (2003), p.683.

Google Scholar

[14] .E. Doege and K. Droder: J. Mater. Proc. Tech. Vol. 115 (2001), p.14.

Google Scholar