Influence of the TMJ Implant Geometry on Stress Distribution

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of Temporomandibular Joint implant geometry on stress distribution in total reconstruction of temporomandibular joint. A three dimensional model of a lower jaw of a patient was developed from a Computed Tomography scan images. Anatomical curvature and flat contact surface of implant design and fixation screws were modeled. Two implanted mandibles were then compared by means of finite element analysis. The muscle forces for incisal clenching were applied. The equivalent stress resulted in contact surface region of the bone and implant and in fixation screw holes were investigated to evaluate the designs. In applied loading condition, The results showed that anatomical design of implant was more preferred and it will lead to long-term success of implant.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

991-995

Citation:

Online since:

March 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Merrill, R.G., Historical perspectives and comparisons of TMJ surgery for internal disk derangements and arthropathy. Cranio. Vol. 4 (1986), pp.74-85.

DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1986.11678133

Google Scholar

[2] Gray, R.J.M., S.J. Davies, A.A. Quayle, and A. British Dental, Temporomandibular disorders: a clinical approach. 1995, London: British Dental Association. v, 84 p.

Google Scholar

[3] Wolford, L.M., D.J. Dingwerth, R.M. Talwar, and M.C. Pitta, Comparison of 2 temporomandibular joint total joint prosthesis systems. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 61 (2003), pp.685-690.

DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50112

Google Scholar

[4] Quinn, P.D., Lorenz prosthesis—total temporomandibular joint reconstruciton. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. Vol. 12 (2000), p.93–104.

Google Scholar

[5] Guarda-Nardini, L., D. Manfredini, and G. Ferronato, Temporomandibular joint total replacement prosthesis: current knowledge and considerations for the future. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 37 (2008), pp.103-110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.09.175

Google Scholar

[6] Eriksson, L. and P.-L. Westesson, Long-term evaluation of meniscectomy of the temporomandibular joint. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 43 (1985), pp.263-269.

DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(85)90284-8

Google Scholar

[7] van Loon, J.P., G.M. de Bont, and G. Boering, Evaluation of temporomandibular joint prostheses: review of the literature from 1946 to 1994 and implications for future prosthesis designs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Vol. 53 (1995), pp.984-96; discussion 996-7.

DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90110-8

Google Scholar

[8] Speculand, B., R. Hensher, and D. Powell, Total prosthetic replacement of the TMJ: experience with two systems 1988–1997. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 38 (2000), pp.360-369.

DOI: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0338

Google Scholar

[9] Ramos, A., A. Completo, C. Relvas, M. Mesnard, and J.A. Simões, Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: The influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 39 (2011), pp.343-350.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.07.006

Google Scholar

[10] Beek, M., J.H. Koolstra, L.J. van Ruijven, and T.M. van Eijden, Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cartilaginous structures in the human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res. Vol. 80 (2001), pp.1913-8.

DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800101001

Google Scholar

[11] Kashi, A., A.R. Chowdhury, and S. Saha, Finite element analysis of a TMJ implant. J Dent Res. Vol. 89 (2010), pp.241-5.

DOI: 10.1177/0022034509357716

Google Scholar

[12] Hsu, J.-T., H.-L. Huang, M.-T. Tsai, L.-J. Fuh, and M.-G. Tu, Effect of Screw Fixation on Temporomandibular Joint Condylar Prosthesis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 69 (2011), pp.1320-1328.

DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.074

Google Scholar

[13] Korioth, T.W. and A.G. Hannam, Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res. Vol. 73 (1994), pp.56-66.

DOI: 10.1177/00220345940730010801

Google Scholar

[14] Asmussen, E., A. Peutzfeldt, and A. Sahafi, Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Vol. 94 (2005), pp.321-329.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.003

Google Scholar

[15] Chen, J., U. Akyuz, L. Xu, and R.M.V. Pidaparti, Stress analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. Medical Engineering & Physics. Vol. 20 (1998), pp.565-572.

DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00070-8

Google Scholar

[16] Roberts, W.E., S. Huja, and J.A. Roberts, Bone modeling: biomechanics, molecular mechanisms, and clinical perspectives. Seminars in orthodontics. Vol. 10 (2004), pp.123-161.

DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2004.01.003

Google Scholar

[17] Mercuri, L.G., Temporomandibular joint reconstruction. Alpha Omegan. Vol. 102 (2009), pp.51-4.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aodf.2009.04.009

Google Scholar