Fabrication and Cutting Performance of CVD Diamond Coated Inserts with Different Coating Thickness in Dry Turning Aluminum Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

CVD diamond coated inserts with different coating thickness are fabricated using hot filament chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) method. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Raman spectroscopy are introduced to characterize the diamond films. The cutting performance of as-fabricated CVD diamond coated inserts is evaluated in dry turning aluminum alloy. The uncoated WC-Co tool is also adopted in the cutting tests for the sake of comparability. The testing results show that diamond coated tools exhibit much better cutting performance. Coating thickness affects the characteristics of diamond coated cutting tools, the thicker of coating, the more adhesive chips, but the better delamination resistant. The uncoated WC-Co tool suffers adhesive wear for the built-up edge (BUE) breaking.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

73-77

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.U. Braga, A.E. Diniz, G.W.A. Miranda and N.L. Coppini: J. Mater. Process. Technol Vol. 122 (2002), p.127.

Google Scholar

[2] G. List, M. Nouari, D. Géhin, S. Gomez, J.P. Manaud, Y. Le Petitcorps and F. Girot: Wear Vol. 259(2005), p.1177.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.056

Google Scholar

[3] M. Lahres, P. Muller-Hummel and O. Doerfel: Surf. Coat. Technol Vol. 91 (1997), p.116.

Google Scholar

[4] T.C.S. Vandevelde, K. Vandierendonck, M. Van Stappen, W. Du Mong and P. Perremans: Surf. Coat. Technol Vol. 113 (1999), p.80.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(98)00831-7

Google Scholar

[5] B. Shen, F. H. Sun, H. G. Xue, M. Chen, Z. M. Zhang, Surf Eng Vol. 25 (2009), p.70.

Google Scholar

[6] Patrick J. Heaney, Anirudha V. Sumant, Christopher D. Torres, Robert W. Carpick, Frank E. Pfefferkorn: Diam. Relat. Mater Vol. 17 (2008), p.223.

Google Scholar