Grinding Surface Creation Simulation Using Finite Element Method and Molecular Dynamics

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents some research results of the application of finite element method and molecular dynamics in the simulation of grinding surface creation. The comparison of these two methods shows that both methods could illustrate the material removal phenomena and provide useful information of grinding mechanics, but they have different feasible application arranges depending on the level of size scales. The investigation demonstrated that rubbing hypothesis of grinding material removal mechanism is valid at all size level even down to nanometre level. Further investigation areas are identified in the paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

314-319

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wu HY, Lee WB, Cheung CF, To S, Chen YP, J Mater Process Tech 167(2-3) (2005): 549-554.

Google Scholar

[2] Brinksmeier E, Aurich JC, Govekar E, Heinzel C, Hoffmeister H-W, Klocke F, Peters J, Rentsch R, Stephenson DJ, Uhlmann E, Weinert K, Wittmann M, Annals of the CIRP 55(2) (2006): 667–696.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2006.10.003

Google Scholar

[3] Mamalis AG, Kundrák J, Manolakos DE, Gyáni K, Markopoulos A, Int J Adv Manuf Tech 21(2003): 929-934.

Google Scholar

[4] Moulik PN, Yang HTY, Chandrasekar S, Int J Mech Sci 43(2001): 831-851.

Google Scholar

[5] Doman DA, Warkentin A, Bauer R, Int J Mach Tool Manu 49(2009): 109-116.

Google Scholar

[6] Klocke F, 1st European conference on Grinding, Aechan 6-7 November (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] Hahn RS, In Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference On Machine tool design and research, Birmingham, UK, (1962) pp: 129-154.

Google Scholar

[8] Doman DA, Bauer R, Warkentin A, Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 223(2009): 1519-1527.

Google Scholar

[9] Takenaka N, Annals of the CIRP 13(1966): 183-190.

Google Scholar

[10] Ram A, Danckert J, Faurholdt T, In Proceeding of 4th European LS-DYNA User's Conference, Ulm, Germany, (2003) pp: 21-34.

Google Scholar

[11] Yao Y, Schlesinger M, Drake GWF, Can J Phys 82(2004): 679-699.

Google Scholar

[12] Lambropoulos JC, Xu S, Fang T, Golini D, Appl Optics 35(28) (1996): 5704-5713.

Google Scholar

[13] Ohbuchi Y, Obikawa T, JSME Int J C-Mech Sy 49(1) (2006): 114-120.

Google Scholar

[14] Klocke F, Beck T, Hoppe S, Krieg T, Müller N, Nöthe T, Raedt H-W, Sweeney K, J Mater Process Tech 120(2002) : 450-457.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)01210-9

Google Scholar

[15] J. Belak and I. F. Stowers, Proc. of the American Society of Precision Eng., (1999), pp.76-79.

Google Scholar

[16] J. Belak and I. F. Stowers, Fundamentals of Friction: Macroscopic and Microscopic, Singer, Pollock E 220, (1991) pp.1-10.

Google Scholar

[17] R. Rentsch and I. Inasaki, Annals of the CIRP Vol. 43, No 1, 1994, pp.327-330.

Google Scholar

[18] R. Komanduri, and L.M. Raff, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Vol. 215 Part B, (2001) pp.1639-1672.

Google Scholar

[19] A.O. Oluwajobi and X. Chen, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automation and Computing, 2010, pp.130-135.

Google Scholar

[20] A.O. Oluwajobi and X. Chen, International Journal of Abrasive Technology, Vol. 3, No. 4. 2010, pp.354-381.

Google Scholar

[21] Q.X. Pei, C. Lu, F.Z. Fang and H. Wu, Comp. Mat. Sci., Vol. 37, 2006, pp.434-441.

Google Scholar

[22] J. Tersoff, Physical Review B, Vol. 38 No 14, 1988, pp.9902-9905.

Google Scholar

[23] S. J. Plimpton, J Comp Phys, Vol. 117, 1995, pp.1-19 and www. lammps. sandia. gov.

Google Scholar

[24] Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD), http: /www. ks. uiuc. edu/Research/vmd/ (Accessed in 2010).

Google Scholar