The Fault Prediction of Aerospace Equipment PHM Technology and its Demonstrated Failure Prediction Module Simulation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Prognostics and Health Management Technology (PHM) will make up the deficiencies of current device monitoring and fault diagnosis, especially the lack of fault prediction. Its combination with the neural network can provide a universal theory and technology of the intelligence prediction. Though the experiments, we establish the BP neural network, as well as the most suitable prediction model. After testing data verification, neural networks can accurately predict the status of the equipment, and the health trends in the future. With the network we can accurately predict the system state, remaining life for the aerospace equipment, make it possible to provide maintenance in time, reduce failure losses and improve reliability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

239-244

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Johnson S B. Introduction to System Health Engineering and Management in Aerospace. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 2005.

Google Scholar

[2] A Hess, L Fila. The joint strike fighter (JSF) PHM concept: potential impact on aging aircraft problems. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 2002.

DOI: 10.1109/aero.2002.1036144

Google Scholar

[3] Z Baozhen. Development and Applications of Integrated Diagnostics, Prognostics and Health Management Technologies of Abroad. COMPUTER MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2008, 16(5):591-594.

Google Scholar

[4] X Jingsong, S Bo,K Rui. Research and application of the prognostic and health management system. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS. 2007, 29(10):1762-1767.

Google Scholar

[5] W Ji, Z Shengkui, Pecht M. Status and Perspectives of Prognostics and Health Management Technologies. ACTA AERONAUTICA ET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA. 2005, 26(5):626-632.

Google Scholar

[6] K Rui, L Ruiying. Failure Rate Forecasting Method Based on Neural Networks. ACTA AERONAUTICA ET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA. 2008, 4(3):138-140.

Google Scholar

[7] RobertHecht-NielsenTheory.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hecht-Nielsen,2010-05-15

Google Scholar

[8] Fei Sike Technology R & D center.Realization of neural network theory and MATLAB7.Beijing:Electronic Industry Press, 2005.

Google Scholar

[9] F Aifeng, Z Hongwei. Radar Equipment Fault Tendency Forecasting Based on Dynamic New-information Model. COMPUTER MEASUREMENT & CONTROL. 2007 15(11).

Google Scholar

[10] Ramakrishnan A, Petcht M..IEEE Transaction an Components and Packaging Technologies, 2003,26(3):625-634.

Google Scholar

[11] Valentin R, Osterman M, Newman B. The Annual Reliability and Maintainability, 2003 Proceedings[C].

Google Scholar

[12] Hall D L, McMullen S A H. Mathematical techniques in multisensor data fusion. Boston: Artech House, 2004.

Google Scholar