Assessment of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions of Polylactic Acid (PLA)/Starch and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Trays

Abstract:

This study aims to assess greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of Poy(lactic acid) (PLA) with cassava starch blend (PLA/starch) and Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) trays from cradle to grave. The various waste treatment scenarios were considered. The functional unit is specified as 10,000 units of 8 x 10 x 2.5 cm. of PLA/starch and PET trays which weigh 597.6 and 582.7.5 kilograms, respectively. The results from cradle to production gate were found that GHG emissions of PLA/starch has 51.38% lower than that of PET. This is because PET has higher weight of the trays. The resin production stage of PET tray has the highest of greenhouse GHG emissions. The results from cradle to grave show that the highest total GHG emissions are observed from PLA/starch or PET trays with 90% of landfill and 10% of incineration. The lowest GHG emissions from disposal PLA/starch and PET trays are from landfill with biogas recovery and incineration with heat recovery. This can be reduced GHG emissions by 3.11103 and 1.28103 kg CO2 equivalent.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)
• Pages: 1468-1474
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.518-523.1468
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Unchalee Suwanmanee, Thanawadee Leejarkpai, Thumrongrut Mungcharoen
• Keywords: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Poly(ethylene terephthalate), Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), Starch, Waste Management

References

[1] J.E.G. Van Dam, B.D. Klerk-Engels, P.C. Struik, R. Rabbinge., Securing renewable resource supplies for changing market demands in bio-based economy. Ind Crops Prod. 21, 129-144, (2005)

DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.02.003

[2] R. Iovino, R. Zullo, M.A. Rao, L. Cassar, L. Gianfreda, Biodegradation of poly(lactic acid)/starch/coir biocomposites under controlled composting conditions. Polym Degrad Stab. 93, 147-157, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.011

[3] G.M. Bohlmann, Biodegradable packaging life cycle assessment. Environ Prog. 23, 342-346, (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/ep.10053

[4] W. Chaya, W. S.H. Gheewala, Life cycle assessment of MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand. J. Cleaner Prod. 15, 1463-1468, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.008

[5] ISO14040, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment Principles and framework. (2006).

[6] ISO14044, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirement and guidelines (2006).

[7] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2001: radiative forcing of climate change. Cambridge University Press. 388-391, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8181(96)00009-4

[8] T. Silalertruksa, SH. Gheewala, Environmental sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Thailand. Energy. 34, 1933-1946, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.08.002

[9] R. Leng, C. Wang, C. Zhang, D. Dai and G. Pu, Life cycle inventory and energy analysis of cassava-based fuel ethanol in China. J. Cleaner Prod. 16, 374-384, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.003

[10] U. Suwanmanee, T. Leejarkpai, Y. Rudeekit and T. Mungcharoen. Life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission of polylactic (PLA) and polystyrene (PS) trays. Nat Sci. 44(4), 703-716, (2010).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.518-523.1468

[11] I. Boustead, Ecoprofiles of the European plastics industry: olefins. Brussels, Belgium: PlasticsEurope, (2005).

[12] Department of Highway. Distance between provinces in Thailand. (2010).

[13] S. Egglesson, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, K., T. Ngara and K Tanabe, IPCC guideline for national greenhouse gas inventories waste. National greenhouse gas inventories programe, Institute for global environmental strategies. vol. 5. Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan (2006).

[14] C. Francesco, S. Bargigli, S. Ulgiati, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfiling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy. 34, 2116-2123, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023

[15] T. Fruergaad, T. Astrup, Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in LCA perspective. Waste manage. 31, 572-582, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.009