Decomposition Analyses for COD Discharges in China’s Industrial Sub-Sectors: Which is the Superior Method?

Abstract:

Numerous index decomposition analysis approaches have been reported in the past 30 years. However, the selection of different methods appears to be arbitrary, and little consensus has been reached on which is the superior method. Between 2001 and 2009, 10 different methods have been used to identify the factors (i.e. production effect, structural effect and intensity effect) influencing on China’s industrial wastewater pollutant (Chemical Oxygen Demand, COD) discharges. From the aspect of theoretical foundation, adaptability, ease of use, and ease of result interpretation, these methods are compared. Results show that: (1) LMDI 1 is a superior approach because of zero residual error in decomposition, no zero values problem in data set, simplicity in formula, and wide range in usage situations. (2) the average effect changes of industrial wastewater changes of COD discharges in China is 14.89 ×104 t with production effect, structural effect, and intensity effect were 72.97×104 t, -6.93×104 t and -80.94×104 t, respectively. (3) production effect was the major factor responsible for the rise of COD discharges, accounting for 45% of the total contribution. (4) structural effect contributed to the decrease of COD discharges with a small effect of 4% in total contribution. (5) intensity effect had an dominant decremental effect in COD discharges.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)
• Pages: 168-177
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.518-523.168
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Xun Feng Xia, Hong Jun Lei, Chang Jia Li, Bei Dou Xi
• Keywords: Decomposition, Divisia Index, Industrial COD Discharges, Laspeyres Index, Methodology

References

[1] B.W. Ang. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1131-1139.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00076-4

[2] R.B. Howarth, L. Schipper, P.A. Duerr, S. Strom.Manufacturing energy use in eight OECD countries. Energy Economics 13(1991) 135-142.

DOI: 10.1016/0140-9883(91)90046-3

[3] B.W. Ang, S.Y. Lee. Decomposition of industrial energy consumption: some methodological and application issues. Energy Economics 16 (1994) 83-92.

DOI: 10.1016/0140-9883(94)90001-9

[4] B.W Ang, E.Q. Zhang. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25 (2000) 1149-1176.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(00)00039-6

[5] H.S. Chung, H.C. Rhee. A residual-free decomposition of the sources of carbon dioxide emissions: a case of the Korean industries. Energy 26 (2001) 15-30.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(00)00045-1

[6] B.W. Ang, F.Q. Zhang, K.H. Choi. Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition. Energy 23(1998) 489-495.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(98)00016-4

[7] Ang BW, Choi KH. Decomposition of aggregate energy and gas emission intensities for industry: a refined Divisia index method. The Energy Journal 18(1997) 59-73.

DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol18-no3-3

[8] S.H. Park. Decomposition of industrial energy consumption: an alternative method. Energy Economics, 14(1992) 265-270.

[9] B.W. Ang, F.L. Liu, H.S. Chung. Index numbers and the Fisher ideal index approach in energy decomposition analysis. Research report 38, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. (2002)

DOI: 10.24867/ijiem-2011-3-113

[10] FY Edgeworth. Papers Relating to Political Economy. New York, NY: Burt Franklin; 1925.

[11] J. Albrecht, D. Erancois, K. Schoors. A Shapley decomposition of carbon emissions without residuals. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 727-736.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00131-8

[12] J.W. Sun. Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Economics, 20(1998) 85-100.

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(97)00012-1

[13] B.W. Ang, F.L. Liu. A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy 26(2001) 537-548.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(01)00022-6

[14] B.W. Ang. Multilevel decomposition of industrial energy consumption. Energy Economics 17(1995) 39-51.

DOI: 10.1016/0140-9883(95)98905-j

[15] G.A. Boyd, D.A. Hanson, T. Sterner. Decomposition of changes in energy intensity—a comparison of the Divisia index and other methods. Energy Economics 10(1988) 309-312.

DOI: 10.1016/0140-9883(88)90042-4

[16] G. Boyd, J.F. McDonald, M. Ross, D.A. Hanson. Separating the changing composition of US manufacturing production from energy efficiency improvements: a Divisia index approach. Energy Journal 8(1987) 77-96.

DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol8-no2-6

[17] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2002-2010.

[18] Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Annual Statistic Report on Environment in China. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, 2001-2009.