Decomposing the Influencing Factors of China’s Industrial Wastewater Discharges Using LMDI I Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

China’s industry accounts for 46.8% of the national gross domestic product (GDP) and plays an important strategic role to its economic growth, but it is also the main water pollution sources. In order to identify the relationship between the underlying driving forces and various environmental indicators, two critical industrial wastewater pollutant discharges over 2001-2009, including Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N), were decomposed into three factors, i.e., production effect (caused by change in the scale of economic activity), structural effect (caused by change in economic structure) and intensity effect (caused by change in technological level of the sector), using a logarithmic mean Divisia index I (LMDI I) decomposition method. Results showed that: (1) the average annual effect changes of industrial wastewater changes of COD discharges in China is -2.99% with the production effect, structural effect, and intensity effect as 14.64%, -1.39%, and -16.24%, respectively. Similarly, the average effect changes of industrial wastewater changes of NH4-N discharges is -4.03% with production effect, structural effect, and intensity effect as 16.18%, -2.88%, and -17.33%, respectively. (2) production effect was the major factor responsible for the rise of COD and NH4-N discharges, accounting for 45% and 44% of the total contribution. (3) structural effect contributed to the decrease of COD and NH4-N discharges with a small effect of 4% and 8% in total contribution. (4) intensity effect had an dominant decremental effect in COD and NH4-N discharges, accounting for 50% and 48% of the total contribution; intensity effect could be further decomposed in cleaner production effect and pollution abatement effect, and cleaner production effect of COD and NH4-N accounts for 60% and 55% in pollution reduction. (5) the main contributors to incremental COD and NH4-N discharges among industrial sub-sectors were manufacture of paper and paper products, processing of food from agricultural products, manufacture of textile and so on. These sectors should be the top priorities for policy makers to reduce pollutants discharges, and the potential measures are industrial restructuring and related regulation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

2089-2098

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.M. Zhang, Z.G. Wen. Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China. J. Environ. Manage. 88(2008) 1249-1261.

Google Scholar

[2] "China passes Germany in economic rankings". CNN. January 15, 2009. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/01/15/china.economy/index.html?iref=topnews.

Google Scholar

[3] E. Backer and G. Heggelund. China and UN environmental policy: institutional growth, learning and implementation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 7(2007) 415-438.

DOI: 10.1007/s10784-007-9053-3

Google Scholar

[4] Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Annual Statistic Report on Environment in China. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, 2001-2009.

Google Scholar

[5] G.M. Grossman, A.B. Krueger. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Working paper No. 3914. National Bureau of economic research. Cambridge MA, 1991.

Google Scholar

[6] H.E. Douglas, M.S. Thomas. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. J. Public Econ., 57(1995) 85–101.

Google Scholar

[7] B. Friedl, M. Getzner. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol. Econ, 45(2003)133–148.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00008-9

Google Scholar

[8] B.W. Ang. Decomposition methodology in energy demand and environmental analysis. In: van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, 1999.

DOI: 10.4337/9781843768586.00091

Google Scholar

[9] C.B. Ma, D.I. Stern. China's changing energy intensity trend: a decomposition analysis. Energy Economics 30(2008) 1037–1053.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.05.005

Google Scholar

[10] J.E. Sinton, M.D Levine. Changing energy intensity in Chinese industry. Energy Policy 22(1994) 239–255.

DOI: 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90162-7

Google Scholar

[11] J.P. Huang. Industrial energy use and structural change: a case study of the People's Republic of China. Energy Econ., 15(1993) 131–136.

Google Scholar

[12] J. He. What is the role of openness for China's aggregate industrial SO2 emission? A structural analysis based on the Divisia decomposition method. Ecological Economics 69(2010), 868–886

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.012

Google Scholar

[13] B.W. Ang, K.H. Choi. Decomposition of aggregate energy and gas emission intensities for industry: a refined Divisia index method. Energy Journal 18(1997) 59-73.

DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol18-no3-3

Google Scholar

[14] B.W. Ang, F.L. Liu. A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy 26(2001) 537–548.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(01)00022-6

Google Scholar

[15] W.C. Wang, H.L. Mu, X.D. Kang, R.C. Song, Y.D. Ning. Changes in industrial electricity consumption in china from 1998 to 2007. Energy Policy, 38(2010) 3684-3690.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.046

Google Scholar

[16] C.B. Ma, D.I. Sternb. Biomass and China's carbon emissions: A missing piece of carbon decomposition. Energy Policy, 36(2008) 2517–2526.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.013

Google Scholar

[17] B.W. Ang. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: what is preferred method? Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1131–1139.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00076-4

Google Scholar

[18] J.W. Sun. Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Economics 20(1998) 85-100.

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(97)00012-1

Google Scholar

[19] G.M. Grossman, A.B. Krueger. Economic growth and the environment. Quart. J. Econ., 110(1995) 353-377.

Google Scholar

[20] S.M. De Bruyn. Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: the case of sulphur emissions. Environ. Dev. Econ., 2(1997) 485-503.

DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x97000260

Google Scholar

[21] B.W. Ang, F.Q. Zhang, K.H. Choi. Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition. Energy 23(1998) 489-495.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(98)00016-4

Google Scholar

[22] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing (2002-2010).

Google Scholar