Advantages of Perennial Crop on Conservation of Agroecological Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Of human activities, agriculture is perhaps the most disruptive to the functioning of ecosystems around the world. As agriculture's impact on the Earth has been amplified by industrial farming, the agroecological environment is worsening. By developing perennial crops, however, would help deal with the multiple issues involving agroecological environmental conservation and economic benefits in a world of shrinking resources. It can provide multiple ecosystem services essential for sustainable production more effectively than production systems based on annual crops, such as reducing soil erosion, minimizing nutrient leaching, sequestering more C in soils, building better pest tolerance and providing continuous habitat for wildlife. This paper presents advantages of perennial crop system in agroecological benefits, introduces the important role of perennial crop at the development of sustainable agriculture, and prospects the significant utilization of perennial crop on conservation of agroecological environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

5213-5216

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Clay. Washington (DC): Island Press. (2004).

Google Scholar

[2] D.Bossio, A.Noble, J.Pretty & F.Penning de Vries, Paper presented at the SIWI/CA Seminar, Stockholm, Sweden, 21 August 2004. Battaramulla, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] H.Godfray, J. Beddington, I. Crute, L. Haddad, D. Lawrence, J. Muir, J. Pretty, S. Robinson , S.Thomas, C.Toulmin, Science, 327, 812-818,(2010).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1185383

Google Scholar

[4] T.S. Cox, L.R. DeHaan, D.L. Van Tassel, and C.M. Cox. Crop and Pasture Science 61:513-521. (2010).

DOI: 10.1071/cp09201

Google Scholar

[5] K.G. Cassman, S. Wood, Pages 741–876 in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis.Washington (DC): Island Press, (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] W. Jackson ,San Francisco: Friends of the Earth, (1980).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Tilman, Robert Socolow, Jonathan A. Foley, H. Jason, E. Larson,L. Lee ,P. Stephen , R. John , S. Tim ,S. Chris andW.B. Robert , Science ,Vol. 325 no. 5938 pp.270-271,(2009).

Google Scholar

[8] H. Eswaran, F. Beinroth and P. Reich,American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 14: 129-136. (1999)

Google Scholar

[9] D.D. Chiras, J.P. Reganold, 9th ed. (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ) (2004)

Google Scholar

[10] E. Mattison, & K. Norris, Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 610–616,(2005).

Google Scholar

[11] S. L. Buchmann, & G. P. Nabhan, Washington, DC: Island Press, (1996).

Google Scholar

[12] M. A. Blumler , and R. Byrne. Current Anthropology 32:23–54 ,(1991).

Google Scholar

[13] G. D. Frankand P. L. Stephen , Plant Physiology 150:2104-2115. (2009)

Google Scholar

[14] J. D. Glover, S.W. Culman, S.T. DuPont, W. Broussard, L.Young, M.E. Mangan,et al., Ecosyst. Environ. 137, 3-12. (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] G.W. Randall, D. Mulla, Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 337-344, (2001)

Google Scholar

[16] D. Tilman, J. Fargione, B. Wolff, C. D'Antonio, A. Dobson, R. Howarth, D. Schindler, W.H. Schlesinger, D. Simberloff, and D. Swackhamer, Science 292: 281-284,(2001).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1057544

Google Scholar

[17] C.J. Gantzer, S.H. Anderson, A.L. Thompson J.R. Brown, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45, 641-644,(1990).

Google Scholar

[18] G.W. Randall, , D.R. Huggins, M.P. Russelle, D.J. Fuchs, W.W. Nelson, and J.L. Anderson. J. Environ. Qual. 26:1240–124, (1997).

Google Scholar

[19] L. Bell, F. Byrne, M. Ewing, and L. Wade, ,Agricultural Systems..96:166–174, (2008)

Google Scholar

[20] P.R. Ward, S.F. Micin, F.X. Dunin, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 347–354, (2006).

Google Scholar